ex0, I am a male, just to save you the p.c'ness
where are all these innocent people that keep getting beaten up?
Search "vigilante attacks on paedophiles" and you'll find plenty of cases where there was no conviction of sex offenses. Even in the cases where they were proven child abusers, who's saying it's right to kill or beat that person when they have done their time? Thats vigilantism, and vigilantism is a crime.
if hunting for paedophiles, is nothing short of medieval witch-hunt. there would be a lot of people hunting for them.ill bring the ropes and sticks to prod them with i have a stepp ladder to push them off dirty dirty kiddie fiddlers.
What are you talking about? There
are alot of people hunting them, but they think they're hunting "raping killing monsters", yet most paedophiles are unlikely to be either of those things. If a paedophile dares to confess his/her
illegal attraction, then he/she is in line to be stabbed by a mob member. The mob, is all those chanting along with CHRIS, and they are painting paedophiles to be this way, so when one of them does murder a paedophile, it will be seen as heroic and socially acceptable. You think children want this for their future, where they're encouraged to hate and hunt a minority of people, who are most likely living terrifed lives? If you think all paedophiles are '
kiddy fiddlers', then you really don't know what the term means and you don't understand the diversity of human nature.
If Sarah Payne was saved know one would ever have knew or heard about her she would have just been a ordinary girl.
So you can't really say that can you?
There is no 'child-love' in raping and killing a little girl, so Roy Whiting was not a paedophile in the true meaning of the word. His psychologist DID make that claim.
50 adults attacked to every abused child?????
There are over 20,000 kids sexually abused every year, so if that figure is correct - then there are one million adults attacked every year!
Ok then, 10 adults attacked, where's the balance just so i know? If it results in innocent people being attacked (no matter how many), then it's not the way forward, simples.
Do you have any sources for 20,000 kids being sexually abused every year being a FACT?
It would seem a pointless hypothetical example, about as equally valid as saying if nobody had children then there would be no child abuse.
You can't take retribution into account, every crime (and every action) has a chance of retribution, should every criminal remain anonymous?
Yes they should. If they are not fit to be in society, then dont have them in society. If they are released back into society upon approval, they have a right to get on with their lives without the fear of being attacked by some thug. You don't get it do you, CHRIS promotes hatred and violence, and a simple verbal denial of that doesn't quite cut it.
I think everybody should be anonymous up to trial, and agree with public trial system BUT once convicted it, they should be public convictions. Pretty much as it is now other than pre-trial is currently in the public domain.
Pre-trial suspects should NOT be in the public domain, and its a wreckless media and weak politicians that have allowed that.
CHRIS claims he "
only touches on the convicted", but that's an outright lie. I would have to repeat myself now, so please look at my earlier posts as to who else he lists.
sorry ex0 but davva is right. if sarah payne wouldn't of died then you it is highly un likely it would of made the national press.
Do you think CHRIS helps prevent children from being killed, or encourages adults to be killed? With most sexual-abuse happening within the family, its the family home that is then listed on CHRIS. Children are going to get hurt too, but this St George wannabee doesn't look further than his ego, and his supporters don't look further than their desire for self-righteousness and violence.