Forums65
Topics76,469
Posts1,033,979
Members14,847
|
Most Online80,173 Apr 25th, 2025
|
|
10 members (2 invisible),
25,255
guests, and
797
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Bins
by diggingdeeper - 8th May 2025 8:12am
|
|
|
|
|
|
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
#99834
4th Aug 2006 11:55pm
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 338
Old Hand
|
OP
Old Hand
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 338 |
me mate has a GTI escort and claims he can hit 60 in just under 7 seconds its a totaly standard gti and i just cant see how it could be so fast acording to manufacturers figures it has 115bhp and does the 0-60 sprint in 9.2 seconds? i think he must be bullshiting seeing as an rs2000 escort can only hit it in 8.2? so he is basically claiming his car is faster than my birds corsa which has 125bhp and hits 60 in 8 seconds? and just under 7 seconds would be faster than a vts saxo and fiesta st and lexus is250 and is just a bit slower than a vxr astra 2.0 turbo! I SMELL SHIIIT!
|
|
|
#99835
5th Aug 2006 12:07am
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,315 Likes: 1
Wiki Master
|
Wiki Master
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,315 Likes: 1 |
lol I get the distinct smell of bulls as well! What mods (if any) has he done to the car? The new RenaultSport Clio (which is 194BHP) only does 0-60 in 6.9 seconds, and I am assuming the Escort will be at least similar in weight to it. We can now await the Ford freaks opinions on this! 
|
|
|
#99836
5th Aug 2006 12:13am
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 338
Old Hand
|
OP
Old Hand
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 338 |
the car is totally standard and i just cant see how its phyisically possible to hit 60 in just under 7 seconds? has to be a lie actually it MUST be a lie.
|
|
|
#99837
5th Aug 2006 12:25am
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,002
Wiki Master
|
Wiki Master
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,002 |
If a std escort GTi can hit 60 in under 7 secs Ill show my bum in Woolworths window on a saturday afternoon. Sub 7 second 0-60's require either power, lack of weight, or both. The Escort GTi in std trim has neither. Hand him a mirror and send him to a corner to have a long hard word with himself 
What If There Were No Hypothetical Questions?
|
|
|
#99838
5th Aug 2006 12:28am
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 338
Old Hand
|
OP
Old Hand
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 338 |
[QUOTE]Originally posted by StuyMac: [QB] If a std escort GTi can hit 60 in under 7 secs Ill show my bum in Woolworths window on a saturday afternoon. 
|
|
|
#99839
5th Aug 2006 9:51am
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,261
Wiki Guide
|
Wiki Guide
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,261 |
Damn i was hoping to get a look at stuy's bum, stop getting my hopes up like that Mr Mac
|
|
|
#99840
5th Aug 2006 2:03pm
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,238
Wiki Addict
|
Wiki Addict
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,238 |
Book figure is 9.2 altho EVER SO SLIGHLTY LESS is possible standard. So he's bullshitting,end of. Even if he'd have said 8.5 i wouldnt believe him
Ive got the 1.8 115PS motor as found in the GTI in my car and altho i havent timed the 0-60 id say its not exactly fast.I wanna get it timed mind to see if i can get it nearer the 9.0 mark
|
|
|
#99841
5th Aug 2006 4:27pm
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,367
Forum Master
|
Forum Master
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,367 |
take it as he "thinks it is as he raced a 7sec car" mind you his "arse dyno" probabley says he has 200bhp 
|
|
|
#99842
5th Aug 2006 4:40pm
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 338
Old Hand
|
OP
Old Hand
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 338 |
he just turned round and said he timed his car 0-60 and it was 7 seconds with a bit of wheel spin so he thinks wthout spining it just under 7.  its funny aint it
|
|
|
#99843
5th Aug 2006 4:46pm
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,367
Forum Master
|
Forum Master
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,367 |
 should rename this Laughter Page
|
|
|
#99844
5th Aug 2006 4:54pm
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,002
Wiki Master
|
Wiki Master
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,002 |
The new Focus ST is about 7 secs to 60 and that has 220bhp Also, if he has timed it himself, 60 "on the clock" is, in reality, only about 55mph 
What If There Were No Hypothetical Questions?
|
|
|
#99845
5th Aug 2006 4:56pm
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,315 Likes: 1
Wiki Master
|
Wiki Master
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,315 Likes: 1 |
Mind you this aint the best thing I have heard this year, a friend of mine rekons she beat a RenaultSport Megane in a race from the lights haha. And she drives a 1.1 Saxo! To this day she is still admant that she beat it and the lad was deffo racing cos in her words, "he was trying his hardest you could tell from the look on his face". Lol women hey! Its a mad world we live in, the laws of physics dont seem to apply anymore, 115BHP Escorts doing 0-60 in under 7 seconds and 60BHP Saxo's beating 225BHP Meganes haha! 
|
|
|
#99846
6th Aug 2006 12:05am
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,367
Forum Master
|
Forum Master
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,367 |
well we all know 1.1 saxo's are ssooooooooooooooooo fast. i seen one KILL a m3 (pity it was parked up tho  ) i remember in the redline mags years ago the editor renton had a corsa gsi with 15's on running 160bhp with the 1.6 his 0-50 was 4.9 where his 0-60 was 6.5. the drag after 50 on such a car rapidly decreases the motion of the car.
|
|
|
#99847
6th Aug 2006 12:50am
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 12,369 Likes: 2
Wiki Master
|
Wiki Master
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 12,369 Likes: 2 |
Originally posted by clj85: the drag after 50 on such a car rapidly decreases the motion of the car. thats exactly the problem with mine, my 0-50 is about 9 secs, but that extra 10 mph make such a difference 
|
|
|
#99848
6th Aug 2006 1:46am
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,238
Wiki Addict
|
Wiki Addict
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,238 |
Just shows that even at his age (im guessing hes a reasonable age due to insuring a GTI) u can still be a complete noob liar twunt,no offence
IMHO 60 on the clocks is 60 chewy. All this 10% accuracy thing is a load of bull IMO. 60 will be 60,or very close to, i know my car at 47 is 47 cos i go past one of those radar speed readers that tells u ur speed,most ive passed it at was 47 and it said 47,my clocks said 47.Plus my Terminal at crail was 70MPH and the clocks said 70 as i was passing the line,hence both my cars have been very accurate when it comes to speedo reading
|
|
|
Click to View Topic.
|
|
Posts: 2,362
Joined: April 2009
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
More Bins
by diggingdeeper - 19th Jul 2024 11:05am
|
|
|
|