Forums Forums National News Jimmy Savile accused of alleged sexual abuse

There was a program on a couple of years ago (I think it was a celebration of Top of the Pops). The Nolan Sisters stated that they HATED going on TOTP if Jimmy Savile was hosting it as he was ALL OVER THEM LIKE A RASH. Trying to kiss and cuddle them, putting his arms around them and making them generally uncomfortable. One of the main complaints they had was they were UNDER 16 at the time, just out of a quiet Irish upbringing and shy. These statements were made when Mr Savile was alive and kicking. It was also a known fact that Mr S had a static Caravan outside of town where all sorts of shenanigans went on.

oh well looks like you have all found him guilty, shame we can not hang him.

they're just pissed off coz Jim didn't fix it for them

no but looks like he fixed it for plenty more...and now there all broken.....whos gonna help now???

thats wiki justice!

the bbc brushed it all under the carpet, from a legal point of view they would be stuffed, they employed him etc...etc...

wonder if his private apartment at broadmoor will come to light??

he was a nonce, simple as.

That doesn't answer why no charges have been brought forward before the death.

There are probably a whole lot more also. These theatricals ,are all in business because of what they are best at.
e.g. pretending to be someone they are not. That is their whole life, play acting. We never know who they really are until afterwards, when all the skleletons come creeping out of the cupboards and sometimes not even then. I also believe that they protect their cronies against such accusations as these in the Jimmy Saville case.
You know what your friend are up to, damn sure they do too. It could be detrimental to themselves if they got involved, so they keep quiet and are as much to blame. Just my opinion.

I think its a little odd to suddenly come out with all these stories now that he is dead, for what reason? If true its not like he is in a position to harm anybody anymore the only reason to do this would be for attention and money.
Same as the Michael Jackson case, the family that took the money to settle outside of court just proved his innocence to me I mean if it was your children who were abused would you want money or would you want to see the man punished.
Unfortunately though mud sticks and these men will forever now be known as pedophiles whether guilty are not. People shouldn't be so stupid to believe what is forced on them as facts by the media. Look beyond and question!

why did Wacko pay out the million then ?

This is an interesting read

http://chris-ukorg.org/cover-ups/jimmy-saville-witch-hunt-or-paedophile/

I hate to say it but I do think he is guilty of what he been accused of and it was very well covered up

PS I don't know how to do links so don't know if ^^ will work .

The CHRIS website is one that has been mentioned on Wiki before, the author of the site having a dubious reputation himself, but that's for another story.

The article makes much noise about famous people around Jimmy Saville and how it was well known that THEY had a fondness for young boys and how the police had warned THESE people away from loitering in public lavatories. However it then goes on to say how JS was using his show to get access to girls, this doesn't make any sense, it was either one or the other. Reading it carefully it actually says nothing at all, just gives details on actual places, which doesn't mean anything.

They show a photo of JS at Broadmoor with Peter Sutcliffe, the wording of the paragraph if read quickly implying that he knew him and was giving him a Masonic handshake. The picture doesn't show JS shaking hands with him, somebody else is, JS is merely in the picture. Broadmoor has a LOT of charity and entertainment events, and that was his job, friends of mine have performed there, I'm fairly sure there are pictures of them in the same shot as Sutcliffe, doesn't mean anything, just that they were there.

JS was always shown as a complete extrovert, a touchy feely type. As a child I thought he wore strange clothes and was funny, as I got older I just thought he was a bit camp. The hugging/holding of the Nolan girl, well maybe it wasn't right if you look at it with evil intent, but I remember Top of he Pops ALWAYS having people up with the DJ's, and they all, always, had one or even both arms around them.

He did a huge amount of work in his life, and the best anyone can come up with is that they think he might have been somewhere where something could possibly have happened although they don't know if he was there at the time, and, he hugged me and I didn't like it then they just need to leave the dead in peace.

why is it that when joe bloggs is accused of fiddling with kids the 'hang em high' attitude comes out but when it's a celebrity, especially one who's 'done a bit for charity', the attitude takes a swift U turn??

RE broadmoor, he had a private apartment there and it was common knowledge that kids were brought in 'to visit' him.

Just read the article ste and take a look at his friends,he had friends in very high places.
Historical case's of child abuse are harder to prove and in the 70's and early 80's it was sadly brushed under the carpet and the victims were left feeling worthless.
Lets see what can of worms this opens up and who get's arrested after the programme is aired as am sure there will be a proper investigation


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...-ITV-goes-where-BBC-fears-to-tread.html#

interesting what esther rantzen has got to say.