Forums Forums Local News children have rights in society

Now you are taking the pi55, you honestly claim that looking at child porn online is not acting on your feelings, try telling that to the poor child in the picture.

And yes still if a paedophile who had never touched a child lived next door I want still want the murderer as he wont be looking at the bait every day.

Exposer you really make my skin crawl and feel that you are either:

A) A paedophile

or

B) On a wind up with the vile you are spouting on about.

I think we have differences of opinion here. Can we keep it as a discussion without resorting to personal insults?

MissGuided: Opinions on this subject always run high, I haven't seen any personal insults though???

You can have a criminal offence without the mens rea though

That would apply in cases of this nature n'est-ce-pas?

IMO, looking at a picture of a child in a sexual way is nearly as bad as looking at the child in a sexual way in person. Somewhere along the line the picture had to be taken and produced and then put on the internet in the first place. Looking at that picture makes the person looking at it just as implicated in that original act AFAIC.

To say that a child doesn't suffer in that case is a load of BS - the child had to suffer to have the picture taken.

Suggesting Exposer may be a paedophile could be construed as a personal insult.

I didn't actually accuse or suggest, I said that I could only see two options. A paedophile or a wind up merchant, truth is I just think he/she is so balck and white in their thoughts they cant see other people views and tries to use their good use of grammar to tie people in knots.

OK. I'll rephrase. You are making personal opinions about another member's character. Better?

Still dont see problem, if I made made a personal opinion about another members charchter in a good light would that be wrong?

This member seems to have signed up for this topic only which helped me make the decision I made, someone even suggested they are probably another member using another account to hide away. Can this be checked out?

Mark has been pm'd with this request.

Thank you, never wanted a row and hope things can move forward sensibly.

I don't think that Exposer would deny that s/he joined to post in this one thread. His/her first post and name pretty much indicates as much.

Not entirely sure what difference it would make if it did turn out to be someone using a second account? His/her points are still valid (and well researched).

Probably best you move to a remote island without the sex offenders on it...

I would agree that people using alternative log ins for a sensitive subject like this should be allowed and their privacy respected, it means a more open discussion can take place - however, no personal insults!

As Mentioned Opinions are welcomed Personal insults are not.
Please be aware we do take Personal Attack on Members Seriously.
If you have any concerns use the Notify a post.
Thanks.

I don't think the suggestion was that someone was doing it to protect their identity so that they could talk about it confidentailly. I think it was meant that someone was doing it to wind things up.

Anyway, I think I've had enough of reading this thread. I'm going to do what I should have done an hour ago. Ignore it and read other threads instead