Video editing software

Re: Video editing software Mark #175493 30th Sep 2007 12:22am
Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 2,990 Birkenhead, United Kingdom SoundLad Are you SoNutz? Forum Master
SoundLad Are you SoNutz? Forum Master Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 2,990 Birkenhead, United Kingdom	Matty ulead was never good at rendering thats why i used to convert my finised products with TVC (total video converter) cause yes for mpeg4 they are big which is kind of confusing.. But anyway still a good editor but yes you do need a converter ifyou wanted to upload sh** to youtube.. Lee Mills

Google Ads

Re: Video editing software BMW Joe #175494 30th Sep 2007 12:23am
Joined: Aug 2004 Posts: 22,315 Likes: 1 Moreton/Beirut/Mobile MattLFC Wiki Master
MattLFC Wiki Master Joined: Aug 2004 Posts: 22,315 Likes: 1 Moreton/Beirut/Mobile	Originally Posted by BMW Joe Originally Posted by MattLFC Ulead is fookin shite if you ask me... wow its MPEG4 video compression is terrible compress it using other software ulead IMO is the best for editing (WMM is easier to use) but WMM constantly crashes for me I need to be able to capture the video not just compress it. General compression software doesnt capture at the same time. I think am just gonna do it on me media centre with WMM cba with this Ulead shite, its going. Modern day MPEG4 should yield better results then 4 yr old WMV at the same file size, not in the case of Ulead though, they have seriously fooked it up!!! My Facebook \| My Photography Website \| Ride TH13TEEN \| My LinkedIn \| My Twitter

Re: Video editing software MattLFC #175513 30th Sep 2007 1:44am
Joined: Aug 2004 Posts: 22,315 Likes: 1 Moreton/Beirut/Mobile MattLFC Wiki Master
MattLFC Wiki Master Joined: Aug 2004 Posts: 22,315 Likes: 1 Moreton/Beirut/Mobile	Using some software that JVC provided with the camera now. Whilst it is only MPEG2 and using around 20MB per minute, its miles better then the Ulead crap lol. My Facebook \| My Photography Website \| Ride TH13TEEN \| My LinkedIn \| My Twitter