WikiWirral Wirral's Biggest Online Forum
Forum Stats
12328 Members
65 Forums
73256 Topics
989090 Posts
27 posts in the last 24hrs
Max Online: 7831 @ 8th Apr 2013 4:18pm
Who's Online - Click Me
83 registered (alan128, 12 invisible), 1394 Guests and 282 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Social Media : Follow Us


(Views 7days)This Weeks Most Read
Finsbury Park mosque. 974
Round the Wirral with a movie camera[1934] 437
Code reader 322
Washing machine 199
Range Rover P38A Air Suspension Help Needed 143
Loving Home Wanted For 3 Cats. 117
Ant and Dec 97
Another Scam 79
Wanted roof box 65
Loving Home Wanted For 3 Cats. 59
New General Forums
Deja Vu, Lightning Strikes Thrice, Groundhog Day
by fish5133
07:38 PM
Ant and Dec
by cools
18th Jun 2017 2:11pm
Another Scam
by Excoriator
18th Jun 2017 10:00am
Happy birthday Ste
by Dilly
12th Jun 2017 7:54am
New Wirral History
Round the Wirral with a movie camera[1934]
by snowhite
16th Jun 2017 2:03pm
Bascule Bridge
by Sufee
6th Jun 2017 9:09pm
Pathe news short - merseytunnel 1934
by oldpm01
5th Jun 2017 1:57pm
1878 Post Office Directory of Cheshire query
by derekdwc
1st Jun 2017 10:41pm
Bakery at 275 Poulton Road 1925 onwards
by JAFitz
30th May 2017 8:59pm
Forum Tips
Photo Gallery Forums
wirral from Liverpool big wheel
New Brighton Big Wheel
Topic Replies
Where In The Wirral Is It??
by diggingdeeper
Yesterday at 09:22 PM
Benefit Cap is Unlawful
by RUDEBOX
Yesterday at 07:37 PM
Suspended sentence for £37,000 benefit fraud mum
by Mark
Yesterday at 06:45 PM
What song are you listening to?
by granny
Yesterday at 10:18 AM
live webcam from africa, a must see
by granny
Yesterday at 09:49 AM
VW t4 fixed side window replacement
by Mike72
Yesterday at 08:00 AM
Sailing volunteers
by diggingdeeper
Yesterday at 12:34 AM
Finsbury Park mosque.
by fish5133
21st Jun 2017 11:48pm
Bromborough Central Power Station
by Jimbo620
21st Jun 2017 7:19pm
June
M Tu W Th F Sa Su
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30
Recent Posts : What's On ?
Shotwick - Old And New (Hall and Solar Farm)
by diggingdeeper
18th Jun 2017 11:41am
Sefton Park
by diggingdeeper
17th Jun 2017 7:28pm
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#955344 - 17th Jul 2015 11:23pm Four sites for a new Mersey tunnel, 1964
yoller Online   content
Smartchild

Registered: 7th Dec 2008
Posts: 466
Loc: Cheshire
This is part of a report to Birkenhead Borough Council in March 1964 by Brian Colquhoun and Partners, consulting engineers, entitled Alleviation of the River Mersey Cross River Traffic Problems.

It sets out four options for relieving the traffic congestion affecting the existing Mersey Tunnel between Birkenhead and Liverpool.

Briefly, the choices put forward were:

1. A new tunnel from Wallasey to Liverpool.
2. A tunnel linking the dock entrances of the existing tunnel between Birkenhead and Liverpool.
3. A new tunnel from Tranmere to Liverpool.
4. A new tunnel from New Ferry to Liverpool.

As we know, the eventual decision was for a new Wallasey tunnel, which was the most expensive option. But itís interesting to think what might have been.

Iíve done my best with reproducing the pages and I hope they are legible. I can only fit so many pages to a posting, so I'll put the others on a second posting ..
.


Attachments: Viewing Permissions May Apply. Click Me
tun1.jpg

tun2.jpg

tunn3.jpg

tunn4.jpg




Edited by Mark (21st Jul 2015 6:57pm)
Edit Reason: renamed topics merged

Top
Google Ads
#955346 - 17th Jul 2015 11:25pm Re: Four sites for a new Mersey tunnel, 1964
yoller Online   content
Smartchild

Registered: 7th Dec 2008
Posts: 466
Loc: Cheshire
Here are the remaining five pages ...


Attachments: Viewing Permissions May Apply. Click Me
tunn6.jpg

tunn7.jpg

tunn8.jpg

tunn9.jpg

tunn10.jpg



Top
#955348 - 17th Jul 2015 11:41pm Re: Four sites for a new Mersey tunnel, 1964 [Re: yoller]
chriskay Offline
Forum Veteran

Registered: 25th Oct 2007
Posts: 4868
Loc: shropshire
Thanks, yoller, most interesting. (I see you spotted the duplicate page in part 1) wink

I see that the decision on the Wallasey option was pretty rapid (1965).
I found this info on the site "Mersey Tunnel Users Association"

Wallasey Tunnel
At the same time as the work alleviating some of the road congestion around the Tunnel entrances, it was decided that a second crossing would be needed. Consultants were appointed and they recommended a 6 lane bridge. Because of the cost, and uncertainty as to which was the best route for a bridge, the authorities decided on a 2 lane tunnel. The new tunnel would run from just north of the old tunnel on the Liverpool side, and on the Wirral side would come out at Seacombe (Wallasey). The Wallasey approach would make use of a disused railway cutting to link up to what would be the M53.

The construction cost (excluding land) was estimated at less than £14 million, and an Act was passed in 1965 authorising the construction. Wallasey joined Birkenhead and Liverpool on the Mersey Tunnels Joint Cttee in September of 1965. The provisions in respect of Tolls were changed so that neither the old Birkenhead Tunnel nor the new Wallasey Tunnel would become free of Tolls till the debts on both tunnels were paid off.

It was later decided to add another 2 lane tube to the Tunnel. It would share the Approach roads etc of the first 2 lane tube. This was provided for in a 1968 Act. The estimated construction cost for this second tube was £7.5 million.

Compared with the construction nearly 40 years earlier of the Birkenhead Tunnel, that of the Wallasey tunnels was far more mechanised. Use was made of huge mechanical moles to excavate the tunnel tubes. They could excavate a 200 foot length in a week.

The final cost for both tubes was over £37 million including £3.5 million for land. Apart from any other factor there had been the usual "unexpected" difficulties that seem to occur with Tunnels and other large construction projects. Adjusting for many years of inflation can not be accurate, but the Wallasey tunnel appears to have cost about 20% more in real terms than the Birkenhead tunnel. This is probably because any savings in construction costs of Tunnels were more than offset by the substantial spending on approaches.

The Wallasey Tunnel was officially opened by the Queen on 24 June 1971. On Sunday 27th there was a charity walk through the tunnel, and it was really opened to traffic from midnight on 27th. About the same time, the Tunnel toll was raised from 10p to 15p.
_________________________
Carpe diem.

Top
#955371 - 18th Jul 2015 9:43am Re: Four sites for a new Mersey tunnel, 1964 [Re: yoller]
Pinzgauer
Unregistered


Many thanks yoller. Interesting stuff indeed. happy

Top
#955378 - 18th Jul 2015 11:21am Re: Four sites for a new Mersey tunnel, 1964 [Re: yoller]
yoller Online   content
Smartchild

Registered: 7th Dec 2008
Posts: 466
Loc: Cheshire
Sorry about the original duplicate page. I don't know if it's technically possible, but if someone at Wikiwirral could put all the pages on one file, it would be handy.

Top
#955401 - 18th Jul 2015 1:06pm Re: Four sites for a new Mersey tunnel, 1964 [Re: yoller]
chriskay Offline
Forum Veteran

Registered: 25th Oct 2007
Posts: 4868
Loc: shropshire
I think the number of files you can attach depends on whether you're User Plus. If you are, I think you can attach more, and larger, files.
_________________________
Carpe diem.

Top
#955463 - 18th Jul 2015 8:36pm Re: Four sites for a new Mersey tunnel, 1964 [Re: chriskay]
petethebike Offline
Enthusiast

Registered: 13th Mar 2011
Posts: 106
Loc: avon dassett
The "Mole" was originally built to bore the spill-way tunnels for the Mangla (spelling)dam project in Pakistan,as I remember.
Nutall-Atkinson,main contactors for the tunnel boring, assembled the machine in the portal area just off St Pauls Road.This used to be a play area prior to this,in which I can remember enjoying the jerker and witches hat.I had a fair few photos of the Mole being assembled,but,they disappeared along with ex wives!
A significant bit of engineering for Wallasey,and it used a piece of redundant rail cutting,thus saving a lot of money.

Top
#955494 - 19th Jul 2015 7:25am Re: Four sites for a new Mersey tunnel, 1964 [Re: yoller]
clung22 Online   content
Member

Registered: 12th Aug 2011
Posts: 78
Loc: bebington
We're still paying for it now it's a fuc ing joke

Top
#955513 - 19th Jul 2015 11:38am Re: Four sites for a new Mersey tunnel, 1964 [Re: yoller]
diggingdeeper Offline

Wiki Master

Registered: 9th Jul 2008
Posts: 10268
Loc: Birkenhead
If the tunnels were free there would be extra traffic and just be one massive traffic jam. It will be interesting to see what difference the new bridge makes to tunnel traffic.
_________________________
In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell

When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser. Socrates

Top
#955627 - 20th Jul 2015 9:59am Re: Four sites for a new Mersey tunnel, 1964 [Re: diggingdeeper]
Gibbo Offline
Forum Addict

Registered: 27th Dec 2010
Posts: 1787
Loc: Oxton
Originally Posted By: diggingdeeper
If the tunnels were free there would be extra traffic and just be one massive traffic jam.


Do people really avoid going through the tunnel just because of the toll?

Top
#955631 - 20th Jul 2015 11:16am Re: Four sites for a new Mersey tunnel, 1964 [Re: yoller]
diggingdeeper Offline

Wiki Master

Registered: 9th Jul 2008
Posts: 10268
Loc: Birkenhead
Put it like this, if the ferries were free don't you think they would be used a lot more than they are now?
_________________________
In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell

When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser. Socrates

Top
#955636 - 20th Jul 2015 11:45am Re: Four sites for a new Mersey tunnel, 1964 [Re: diggingdeeper]
chriskay Offline
Forum Veteran

Registered: 25th Oct 2007
Posts: 4868
Loc: shropshire
I think the comparison with the ferries is unreasonable. Using the ferry could be viewed as a pleasant experience and I do think that if they were free, they would be used more. I don't think using the tunnel could be seen in the same way.
My own view, and I speak, of course, as a non-local, is that if they were free, that the slight increase in volume of traffic would be offset by the removal of the requirement to stop at the toll booths.
Any increase in traffic would presumably come from commuters switching from bus or rail, but then they would have to be able to park on the other side, which would be extremely difficult. I would imagine that some would try it for a while, but would revert to public transport.
Oh, I don't know if I've mentioned it before, but talking of the ferry: a single ferry fare from Woodside to Pier Head is £5.50. An all areas Saveaway, which includes the ferries and all buses and trains as far as Chester and Southport only costs £5.10. doh
_________________________
Carpe diem.

Top
#955647 - 20th Jul 2015 2:32pm Re: Four sites for a new Mersey tunnel, 1964 [Re: yoller]
diggingdeeper Offline

Wiki Master

Registered: 9th Jul 2008
Posts: 10268
Loc: Birkenhead
I think there would be a substantial increase in traffic partly from local shoppers, freight and commuters and also the traffic in the more southern parts of the Wirral that travel to Liverpool (and further afield) via Runcorn as that route is more cost effective.

I'm sure some study will have done an estimate and I will keep an eye out.

I strongly disagree with the Tunnel Tolls but I also don't want to see traffic jams backing up to Tranmere Rovers as happened in the past and the associated side-street route dodging.

The Tunnels are very jammed in the mornings with commuter traffic now - I spent four years commuting to Liverpool in the last ten. The jams are the tunnel side of the toll booths.
_________________________
In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell

When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser. Socrates

Top
#955701 - 20th Jul 2015 9:31pm Re: Four sites for a new Mersey tunnel, 1964 [Re: clung22]
petethebike Offline
Enthusiast

Registered: 13th Mar 2011
Posts: 106
Loc: avon dassett
Originally Posted By: clung22
We're still paying for it now it's a fuc ing joke


It must be remembered,under river tunnels leak! Even with the best construction in the world,they still leak. It costs money to pump the water out,exhaust foul air and supply fresh.Emergency vehicles have to be provided and manned year around.General taxation? I don't think so.
As much as I hate tolls,I can see why an income for the project is needed.Don't forget they're now getting on a bit,and we'd be lost without them.


Edited by petethebike (20th Jul 2015 9:32pm)

Top
#955702 - 20th Jul 2015 9:39pm Re: Four sites for a new Mersey tunnel, 1964 [Re: diggingdeeper]
petethebike Offline
Enthusiast

Registered: 13th Mar 2011
Posts: 106
Loc: avon dassett
Originally Posted By: diggingdeeper
Put it like this, if the ferries were free don't you think they would be used a lot more than they are now?

They'd all be like the old Royal Iris,things cost money to keep going,especially old things,especially boats!


Edited by petethebike (20th Jul 2015 9:40pm)

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Moderator:  Mark 
Random Wirral Images

Click to View Topic.
Newest Topics
Benefit Cap is Unlawful
by RUDEBOX
Yesterday at 07:37 PM
VW t4 fixed side window replacement
by Mike72
Yesterday at 08:00 AM
Range Rover P38A Air Suspension Help Needed
by Martin1943
20th Jun 2017 8:06pm
Loving Home Wanted For 3 Cats.
by DavidC
20th Jun 2017 8:32am
Finsbury Park mosque.
by Beethoven
19th Jun 2017 11:42am
For Sale & Free
Washing machine
by GingerTom
20th Jun 2017 9:05pm
22" full 1080p hd and freeview tv
by monsterz4
20th Jun 2017 8:50pm
Apple TV box the 1gen
by monsterz4
20th Jun 2017 8:48pm
42 lf smart tv
by stumpyduck
20th Jun 2017 8:15pm
Wanted roof box
by monsterz4
19th Jun 2017 10:32am
Featured Member
Registered: 8th Oct 2011
Posts: 1758
Newest Members
Fairz87, mikerobbo84, Robbo1960, Gwhiz03, SamphireGreen
12328 Registered Users
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
New Wirral Info
Shotwick - Old And New (Hall and Solar Farm)
by diggingdeeper
15th Jun 2017 10:19pm
Sefton Park
by diggingdeeper
15th Jun 2017 10:02pm
Property Law
by lau2908
14th Jun 2017 8:04pm
van driver needed
by futurepast
14th Jun 2017 7:34pm
Sailing volunteers
by dogsbrain
14th Jun 2017 4:31pm
News : New Topics
Benefit Cap is Unlawful
by RUDEBOX
Yesterday at 07:37 PM
Finsbury Park mosque.
by Beethoven
19th Jun 2017 11:42am
Grenfell Tower - Notting Hill
by diggingdeeper
14th Jun 2017 5:13am
Manchester airport
by Dilly
9th Jun 2017 6:01pm
helicopter landing irby park
by fish5133
7th Jun 2017 12:22am
New Enthusiast Forums
VW t4 fixed side window replacement
by Mike72
Yesterday at 08:00 AM
Range Rover P38A Air Suspension Help Needed
by Martin1943
20th Jun 2017 8:06pm
Loving Home Wanted For 3 Cats.
by DavidC
20th Jun 2017 8:32am
Loving Home Wanted For 3 Cats.
by DavidC
18th Jun 2017 6:02pm
Code reader
by madrob
16th Jun 2017 9:09am
(Views 24hrs)Trending Newest Topics
Benefit Cap is Unlawful 35
VW t4 fixed side window replacement 28
Deja Vu, Lightning Strikes Thrice, Groundhog Day 19
Wirral Sunrise Sunset
Sunrise Fri 4:43am
Sunset Fri 9:45pm
Local Time Fri 2:59am
WikiWirral Can . . . .