Our Success is in our members who value our strength as a valued community.
Forum Statistics
Posts1,031,737
Topics76,057
Members14,043
Forums65
Posts in last 24hrs4
Most Online14,906
Nov 23rd, 2019
Who's Online Now
27 registered members (8 invisible), 1,316 guests, and296 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Popular Topics(Views 7days)
New General Forums
The Winter of 1963
by Griff20. 2nd Jan 2022 10:12am
Merry christmas
by cools. 25th Dec 2021 7:55am
Losing our Freedom re COVID booster jab
by Longnails. 4th Dec 2021 11:40pm
FastShow
by GaryFromWirral. 2nd Dec 2021 3:22pm
New Wirral History
Cleggs stonemasons
by steviebyday. 16th Jan 2022 6:49pm
The old flour mills of Wirral 1903
by _Ste_. 29th Dec 2021 7:46pm
Wheatsheaf Hotel 39 Corporation Road
by Lovelfc88. 23rd Dec 2021 5:57pm
Birkenhead rail tunnels construction pictures?
by yoller. 23rd Dec 2021 10:08am
Flaybrick Lodge rooftop query
by derekdwc. 9th Dec 2021 1:51pm
Forum Tips
Photo Gallery Forums
Cruise liner Anthem of the Seas
Tram by the Penny Bridge
Topic Replies
Cleggs stonemasons
by bert1. 17th Jan 2022 10:40am
Wheatsheaf Hotel 39 Corporation Road
by bert1. 15th Jan 2022 5:48am
Woodchurch Leisure centre and libraries?
by Greenwood. 13th Jan 2022 2:30pm
Wildbrook Drive Idiotic Motorbike Riders Nuisance!
by mikeeb. 13th Jan 2022 12:28pm
Echo and the bunnymen, Liverpool Feb. 14
by Jakeypoos. 12th Jan 2022 10:12pm
MG Midget
by Gibbo. 12th Jan 2022 12:26pm
Nuisance Motor Bikes In Wildbrook Drive, Bidston.
by Jobneeded67. 12th Jan 2022 9:49am
The old flour mills of Wirral 1903
by Greenwood. 11th Jan 2022 9:25am
Worth a watch ...
by diggingdeeper. 10th Jan 2022 5:57pm
January
M T W T F S S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Recent Posts : What's On ?
Previous Topic
Next Topic
Print Topic
Rate Topic
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Should the accusers be named? #850460
14th Jan 2014 10:15pm
14th Jan 2014 10:15pm
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 720
Prenton, Wirral
E
Elizabeth Offline OP
Veteran
Elizabeth  Offline OP
Veteran
E
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 720
Prenton, Wirral
Just watching the news about Dave Lee Travis, Rolf Harris, William Roache et al. Is it just me who believes that if they are all found not guilty of their alleged charges, then the women who brought the charges against them should be named?
I think it's grossly unfair, thinking back to the case with Kevin LeVell, that he had to endure the whole saga which likely ruined his life for many months (and probably still is) and yet the girl who pressed charges gets away without any recourse.

Google Ads
Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: Elizabeth] #850480
14th Jan 2014 11:05pm
14th Jan 2014 11:05pm
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,518
Merseyside
Willo_ Offline
Forum Master
Willo_  Offline
Forum Master
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,518
Merseyside
Just because a jury clears someone it does not mean they are totally 100% innocent, there a number of reasons why a jury finds someone not guilty, perhaps the alleged victim can not remember all details, maybe because there head is so screwed up after what happened to them, there mind blocks out certain parts.

And you say name them.

Here is a scenario for you:

Your walking down the street and you are dragged in the bushes and assaulted, but you go home and get showered washing vital evidence away, you go to the police and report it after, (it goes without saying the police will believe you) they go and arrest someone for it, (you do not want your name published) which is fair enough.
Now in court you can not remember much about the night as thinking about it makes you depressed and causes you emotional pain, and also you washed vital evidence away, the jury clear this person.

So you agree that your name should be published in the papers and the news branding you a lier.

I think not.

And am sorry but if there was a prize for the most stupid idea
then you have just won 1st prize.




Last edited by Mark; 15th Jan 2014 10:23am. Reason: Image Removed

..
Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: Elizabeth] #850482
14th Jan 2014 11:15pm
14th Jan 2014 11:15pm
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,957
Wallasey
S
Salmon Offline
Forum Addict
Salmon  Offline
Forum Addict
S
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,957
Wallasey
Taking the above into account why should the accused be named before the jury finds them guilty?
e.g.

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/n...o-face-her-victim-in-court-29733885.html

Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: Elizabeth] #850486
14th Jan 2014 11:33pm
14th Jan 2014 11:33pm
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446
Here.
RUDEBOX Offline
Wiki Master
RUDEBOX  Offline
Wiki Master
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446
Here.
Lets not forget that Legal Aid has now gone....



Mia Mabel

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh! Jer-e-my Cor-byn

Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: Willo_] #850487
14th Jan 2014 11:35pm
14th Jan 2014 11:35pm
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446
Here.
RUDEBOX Offline
Wiki Master
RUDEBOX  Offline
Wiki Master
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446
Here.
Originally Posted by Willo_
Just because a jury clears someone it does not mean they are totally 100% innocent, there a number of reasons why a jury finds someone not guilty, perhaps the alleged victim can not remember all details, maybe because there head is so screwed up after what happened to them, there mind blocks out certain parts.

And you say name them.

Here is a scenario for you:

Your walking down the street and you are dragged in the bushes and assaulted, but you go home and get showered washing vital evidence away, you go to the police and report it after, (it goes without saying the police will believe you) they go and arrest someone for it, (you do not want your name published) which is fair enough.
Now in court you can not remember much about the night as thinking about it makes you depressed and causes you emotional pain, and also you washed vital evidence away, the jury clear this person.

So you agree that your name should be published in the papers and the news branding you a lier.

I think not.

And am sorry but if there was a prize for the most stupid idea
then you have just won 1st prize.



withthat


Mia Mabel

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh! Jer-e-my Cor-byn

Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: Salmon] #850492
14th Jan 2014 11:51pm
14th Jan 2014 11:51pm
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 17,739
Wirral
G
granny Offline
Wiki Master
granny  Offline
Wiki Master
G
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 17,739
Wirral
Originally Posted by Salmon
Taking the above into account why should the accused be named before the jury finds them guilty?
e.g.

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/n...o-face-her-victim-in-court-29733885.html


Agreed, and with regard to naming accusers, that is also a very sensitive issue. I don't think they should be named in these cases, but maybe the accuser should be liable to pay some compensation, if the accused is found innocent.


Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves. All things are bound together. All things connect.
~Chief Seattle
Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: Elizabeth] #850495
15th Jan 2014 12:05am
15th Jan 2014 12:05am
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446
Here.
RUDEBOX Offline
Wiki Master
RUDEBOX  Offline
Wiki Master
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446
Here.
What if the accused can afford to buy a top rate lawyer and the survivor/ victim cannot?


Mia Mabel

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh! Jer-e-my Cor-byn

Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: RUDEBOX] #850497
15th Jan 2014 12:10am
15th Jan 2014 12:10am
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 17,739
Wirral
G
granny Offline
Wiki Master
granny  Offline
Wiki Master
G
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 17,739
Wirral
Originally Posted by RUDEBOX
What if the accused can afford to buy a top rate lawyer and the survivor/ victim cannot?


What if the accused can't and the accuser can ? That would be a more serious issue. smile


Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves. All things are bound together. All things connect.
~Chief Seattle
Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: granny] #850499
15th Jan 2014 12:17am
15th Jan 2014 12:17am
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446
Here.
RUDEBOX Offline
Wiki Master
RUDEBOX  Offline
Wiki Master
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446
Here.
Originally Posted by granny
Originally Posted by RUDEBOX
What if the accused can afford to buy a top rate lawyer and the survivor/ victim cannot?


What if the accused can't and the accuser can ? That would be a more serious issue. smile
Fair point. smile Well, not 'more serious' but equally unfair.

Last edited by RUDEBOX; 15th Jan 2014 12:21am.

Mia Mabel

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh! Jer-e-my Cor-byn

Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: RUDEBOX] #850501
15th Jan 2014 12:21am
15th Jan 2014 12:21am
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,631
Wirral
T
TheDr Offline
Forum Master
TheDr  Offline
Forum Master
T
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,631
Wirral
How about one of the foundation stones of the British legal system, Innocent Until PROVEN Guilty means that no one can report on a case (with names) until the case is over.

If they are found Guilty, they can be named.

If they are found Not Guilty, they can't.

Forget all this rubbish about how if the names are published other victims could come forward, if the case was strong enough to win (and if it isn't legally it shouldn't be proceeded with anyway) then let it stand on its own feet.

Lives can be ruined FOREVER with false accusations, and some lies never die.

I don't think that accusers should have to pay the accused money if they are found Not Guilty, but I do think that any record check for any future prosecutions should show the History of any previous allegations made by the accusers.

Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: Elizabeth] #850503
15th Jan 2014 12:30am
15th Jan 2014 12:30am
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446
Here.
RUDEBOX Offline
Wiki Master
RUDEBOX  Offline
Wiki Master
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446
Here.
Whatever happened to 'Innocent until proven guilty'?

The news is full of alleged offenders- was I asleep when the Law changed? Has it changed,even?


Mia Mabel

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh! Jer-e-my Cor-byn

Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: Elizabeth] #850531
15th Jan 2014 10:12am
15th Jan 2014 10:12am
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 37
Wallasey
L
LiamW Offline
Newbeee
LiamW  Offline
Newbeee
L
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 37
Wallasey
They are named so others can come forward.

Without them being named, evidence might not be found.

Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: Elizabeth] #850532
15th Jan 2014 10:21am
15th Jan 2014 10:21am
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 21,240
Wirral
Mark Offline

Wiki Master
Mark  Offline

Wiki Master
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 21,240
Wirral
I don't think the law has changed, I think its the reporters using the words "Reportedly" and "allegedly" gets into the media and then it spreads.

But then thinking about it we always read Mr x has been remanded in custody until the court date charged with xxx. That gets into the news because you will have reporters in the courts posting such. I think there are even court listings in the buildings so you know who is in what court.

Innocent until proven guilty is all about the court room. IMO.

isn't that why it got to the point with the newspapers to sign up to a code of conduct to self police as it was all getting out of hand.

More should be done to protect the innocent, in certain cases, but with the names listed above, the media gave the victims the strength to come forward.

So i don't think there is one answer to fit all situations.

My thoughts.


My Avatar images are all from the Wirral Gallery.Click Me
Wow Wirral History is coming along Great! Wirral History

we get +200 new members a month now smile
Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: Elizabeth] #850540
15th Jan 2014 11:38am
15th Jan 2014 11:38am
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,237
Oxton
Gibbo Offline
Forum Master
Gibbo  Offline
Forum Master
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,237
Oxton
I was reading about this on another forum and someone brought up Peter Adamson - Len Fairclough from Corrie.

Everyone remembers the accusations, but what they don't remember is that he was cleared.

Even his obituary continued to tar and taint him:

Street's shamed Len Fairclough dies
Disgraced Coronation Street star Peter Adamson - who played womaniser Len Fairclough in the soap - has died a penniless recluse.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-95683/Streets-shamed-Len-Fairclough-dies.html

Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: Elizabeth] #850541
15th Jan 2014 11:55am
15th Jan 2014 11:55am
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 21,240
Wirral
Mark Offline

Wiki Master
Mark  Offline

Wiki Master
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 21,240
Wirral
That is So Sad.
From a Screen Idol to Nobody.

I didn't even realise he had been cleared.


My Avatar images are all from the Wirral Gallery.Click Me
Wow Wirral History is coming along Great! Wirral History

we get +200 new members a month now smile
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Mod 

Random Wirral Images

Click to View Topic.
Newest Topics
Cleggs stonemasons
by steviebyday. 16th Jan 2022 6:49pm
Woodchurch Leisure centre and libraries?
by Greenwood. 11th Jan 2022 9:10am
Worth a watch ...
by GaryFromWirral. 9th Jan 2022 10:22pm
Tony Blair Knighthood
by diggingdeeper. 7th Jan 2022 12:49pm
Glass replacment
by Wickerman. 6th Jan 2022 7:55pm
For Sale & Free
Echo and the bunnymen, Liverpool Feb. 14
by Jakeypoos. 12th Jan 2022 10:12pm
Magic mystie
by lincle. 7th Jan 2022 11:12am
Car battery charger
by madrob. 29th Dec 2021 2:02pm
Member Spotlight
KevinFinity
KevinFinity
Wirral
Posts: 2,343
Joined: April 2009
Show All Member Profiles 
Newest Members
Simon_Beasor, ronald, Animac, Barney54, Bugzee007
14043 Registered Users
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
New Wirral Info
Glass replacment
by Wickerman. 6th Jan 2022 7:55pm
Nuisance Motor Bikes In Wildbrook Drive, Bidston.
by Jobneeded67. 21st Dec 2021 12:43pm
Nuisance Motor Bikes In Wildbrook Drive, Bidston.
by Jobneeded67. 21st Dec 2021 12:17pm
News : New Topics
Woodchurch Leisure centre and libraries?
by Greenwood. 11th Jan 2022 9:10am
Tony Blair Knighthood
by diggingdeeper. 7th Jan 2022 12:49pm
Dr Fauci answering Questions over Gain Of Function
by BultacoAstro. 26th Dec 2021 9:55am
Wildbrook Drive Idiotic Motorbike Riders Nuisance!
by Jobneeded67. 21st Dec 2021 12:38pm
Bidston Tip Fire
by diggingdeeper. 15th Dec 2021 4:46pm
New Enthusiast Forums
Worth a watch ...
by GaryFromWirral. 9th Jan 2022 10:22pm
Panther & Rottweiler
by GaryFromWirral. 4th Jan 2022 5:29am
MG Midget
by Staged54. 3rd Jan 2022 9:12pm
Can You Recommend a Landscape Gardener in Wirral
by sneakypete. 14th Sep 2021 2:13pm
Bidston Hill Underground Tunnels Part 2
by robbo_theman. 23rd Sep 2008 8:58pm
Popular Topics(Views 24hrs)
Wirral Sunrise Sunset
Sunrise Mon 8:17am
Sunset Mon 4:27pm
Local Time Mon 10:59am
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1.1