| | 
| 
 
| Forums65 Topics76,516 Posts1,034,197 Members14,917 |  | Most Online121,890Sep 24th, 2025
 |  |  
| 
	
 
| 8 members (3 invisible),
42,421
guests, and 
867
robots. |  
| 
	Key:
	Admin,
	Global Mod,
	Mod
 |  |  
| 
 
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |  
|  |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |  
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |  
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |  
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |  
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |  |  |  | 
 
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Oct 2007 Posts: 4,868 Forum Veteran |  
|   Forum Veteran Joined:  Oct 2007 Posts: 4,868 | 
Great stuff. Finally some definitive info.     And to think this all started with a 2 line reference in the book "Sidelights on Tranmere".  
 Carpe diem.
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Pinzgauer
 Unregistered |  
| Pinzgauer Unregistered | 
Your excellent work MrG65 has answered a lot of questions and put some hard facts on a lot of theories about the sewer layout. Many thanks again !
 Due to the depths involved, I would think a lot it would be driven tunnel as opposed to cut & cover. Driving a heading through sandstone (?) only 51" dia. must have been good for the back !!
 
 Extracts from "Civil Engineer" or similar from time of construction might throw some light on the tunnelling techniques (an unhealthy interest of mine!).
 
 A few folk on here owe you a pint sir !
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jan 2010 Posts: 1,916 Likes: 4 Forum Addict |  
|   Forum Addict Joined:  Jan 2010 Posts: 1,916 Likes: 4 | 
Can you post the information you have on the Great Culvert please?
 From what little I know about this, it could be one of the wonders of Birkenhead, comparable to Hamilton Square even! I would love to see photographs of it if any exist.
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Feb 2010 Posts: 56 Member |  
| OP   Member Joined:  Feb 2010 Posts: 56 | 
I'll put the Great Culvert Report up in a new thread in the near future - bit of typing for me to do.................
 I did say I'd put the third and final part of the Report forming the earlier bulk of this thread up, for completeness. I can't seem to post the information in a table format, so it'll have to go up as a clump of text.
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Feb 2010 Posts: 56 Member |  
| OP   Member Joined:  Feb 2010 Posts: 56 | 
Ok, here's the final part of the Report, dealing with a forward programme of Borough-wide improvement works. Probably not as interesting as the first two parts, and posted for completeness.
 The first cost given for each item is the total estimated cost; the second is the Corporations estimated approximate liability. It all looks better and much more readable in tables.
 
 --------------------------------------
 
 PROSPECTIVE COMMITMENTS FOR NEXT FIVE YEARS.
 
 With regard to the Corporation’s commitments for schemes of work in hand or in contemplation, I submit herewith a schedule of the works which have been commenced and are being carried out under my supervision, and also of works upon which I have reported (with or without estimates) to the various Committees concerned.
 
 ROAD & IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE.
 
 FIVE YEARS’ PROGRAMME OF WORKS ON CLASSIFIED ROADS TOWARDS WHICH THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT MAKES GRANTS.
 
 1	Woodchurch Road widening	35,500	15,325
 2	Widening Railway Bridge, Woodchurch Rd.	20,000	5,000
 3	Old Chester Road widening south of Kings Lane. (Joint Scheme).	10,775 (Corporation’s proportion)	5,510
 4	Bebington Road widening	14,700	7,650
 5	Chester Street from a point just north of St. Mary’s Gate to the south side of the railway bridge on the easterly side, and on the westerly side from Mason St. and for a short distance into Waterloo Place.	90,000	53,400
 (The estimate in connection with item 5 is based on the assumption that the licences of “The Letters” Public House and “The Shakespeare” Hotel can be transferred to other sites, and no amount is included in this estimate for the value of the licences.)
 6	Railway Bridge, Chester St.	50,000	12,500
 7	Storeton Road.	34,500	21,400
 8	Upton – Barnston Road.	31,000	14,200
 9	Pensby Road	24,000	13,000
 10	Bedford Road	22,000	8,350
 11	Hoylake Road	9,000	3,600
 12	Boundary Road	25,000	13,250
 13	New Chester Road	25,000	10,000
 14	Borough Road	6,000	1,500
 The estimated total cost of these works is £397,475 of which it is expected £184,685 will be a liability on the Corporation, and it is further anticipated that £20,000 of this expenditure may be incurred in the present financial year, and the remainder spread in equal payments over the succeeding four years.
 With the exception of items 1 and 7, none of these works are actually in hand at the present time, but it is expected that a commencement will shortly be made with items 3, 8 and 14.
 Total:-	397,475	184,685
 
 FURTHER PROSPECTIVE EXPENDITURE
 
 In addition to the above-mentioned works which the Council have submitted to the Minstry of Transport as their programme for the next five years, the following works are in contemplation without reference to time of completion.
 
 WORKS IN HAND AT PRESENT ON ROADS & TOWARDS THE COST OF WHICH THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT OR UNEMPLOYMENT GRANTS COMMITTEE MAKE CONTRIBUTIONS.
 
 15	Borough Road, Reconstruction of carriageway between Prenton Rd. and the Borough boundary.	8,600	5,375
 16	Argyle St. South. Paving of carriageway from Helena St. to Hinderton Rd.	900	450
 The first three of the following road improvements were included in the Birkenhead Corporation Bill 1930, and most of them will very shortly be put in hand:-
 17	Well Lane Improvement	1,600	1,600
 18	New Road from Holborn Hill to Thompson St.	660	660
 19	Derby Road Improvement	1,250	1,250
 20	Further widening of Derby Rd., over land belonging to Public Assistance Comm.	524	524
 
 FURTHER ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ON ROADS FOR WHICH THE NECESSARY LAND OR PROPERTY INVOLVED HAS HAD OR WILL HAVE TO BE ACQUIRED BY NEGOTIATION.
 
 21	Old Chester Rd. from Queen St. to Bebington Road.	70,000	47,500
 22	New roads and sewers in development of Royden Estate	20,000	20,000
 23	New road opposite Birkenhead Priory (St. Mary’s Gate).	15,000	15,000
 24	Prenton Rd. East.	8,700	8,700
 25	Prenton Rd. West	6,500	6,500
 26	Balls Road	4,500	4,500
 27	Fairclough Lane	300	300
 28	Bidston Road	5,500	2,800
 29	Claughton Rd.	3,000	3,000
 30	Sparks Lane, Thingwall	13,000	13,000
 31	Church Road	3,000	1,500
 32	Greenway Rd.	10,500	10,500
 33 	Palm Grove (resurfacing)	4,717	2,700
 
 SEWERING WORKS IN RESPECT OF THE COST OF WHICH ASSISTANCE MAY POSSIBLY BE OBTAINED FROM THE UNEMPLOYMENT GRANTS COMM.
 
 34	New sewer in Park Rd. North & Cavendish St.	17,000	10,625
 35	Tollemache Rd. Sewer	10,500	6,563
 36	St. Paul’s Rd outfall sewer from river to Albany Rd.	85,000	55,125
 37	Extension of sewer from Albany Rd. through Victoria Park to Borough Rd. at Temple Rd.	40,000	25,000
 These two latter works are fully described in the first part of the report.
 38	Reconstruction of defective sewers in old part of Borough between Argyle St. and Duke St.	100,000	100,000
 OTHER SEWERS IN RESPECT OF THE COST OF WHICH IT IS NOT EXPECTED ASSISTANCE CAN BE OBTAINED.
 
 39	New sewer from the Upton – Barnston Rd. valley sewer around Thingwall corner to the summit of Pensby Road	5,500	5,500
 40	New sewer, Mill Rd. to Upton – Barnston Rd.	2,600	2,600
 41	New sewer in Thingwall from Sparks Lane to Pensby Road.	1,100	1,100
 42	New sewer to cottages, Thingwall Common adjoining Sanatorium	1,300	1,300
 
 
 ESTATES & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
 
 The erection of 182 houses on the Albany Rd. Estate at a cost of £64,174; 20 tenements between Priory St. and Church St. at a cost of about £9,350, are almost completed, and I am not including these amounts in the total figure.
 
 43	The erection of 308 houses on the Dacre Hill Estate by the Works Department, estimated cost, with streets and sewers (Coporation liability £3.15.0 x 40 years x 308)	116,714	46,200
 44	A programme which has been outlined by this Committee for the erection of 5,111 new houses during the next five years, together with the cost of clearing the insanitary areas in the town and providing for the housing of dispossessed tenants, is estimated to cost (Corporation liability £3.15.0 x 40 years x 5111)	2,190,000	766,650
 
 SANITARY COMMITTEE
 
 45	Garage and fitting shop	7,500	7,500
 
 TRAMWAYS COMMITTEE
 
 46	Tram and bus garage at New Ferry (U.G.C. Grant applied for but not yet promised)
 
 To purchase the land 	18,500
 
 
 2,100	11,500
 
 
 2,100
 47	Mess Rooms and Cash Office at Woodside Ferry	1,400	1,400
 48	Messroom, Laird St. Depot, nearing completion	4,206	4,206
 
 ELECTRICITY COMMITTEE
 
 49	Transformer Stations, during the next five years
 To purchase of sites for –do- 	10,000
 2,000	10,000
 2,000
 
 FINANCE COMMITTEE
 
 50	Provision for administrative staffs which cannot be conveniently housed in the Town Hall at the present time. Purchase of sites for –do-	15,000
 
 2,500	15,000
 
 2,500
 
 M. &  C.W. COMMITTEE
 
 51	South End Clinic	7,157	7,157
 
 HEALTH COMMITTEE
 
 52	Extensions to I.D. Hospital at present in hand	9,000	9,000
 53	New offices for the Medical Officer of Health and other officials engaged on the medical services of the Borough, including site	25,000	25,000
 
 MARKETS & BATHS COMMITTEE
 
 54	South End Baths (U.G.C. grant applied for but not yet promised)	47,500	30,000
 55	Weights & Measures Offices at the Rendel St. Entrance to the Tunnel.	3,600	3,600
 
 PARKS & CEMETERY COMMITTEE
 
 56	Layout of Arrowe Park which is being carried out in conjunction with the Parks Superintendent	37,539	37,539
 57	Layout and fencing to Cemetery at Landican and erection of Chapel and Registrar’s lodge, including cost of land	46,000	46,000
 
 WATCH COMMITTEE
 
 58	Alterations to Bridewell at Sessions Court	1,560	1,560
 59	Extensions to Central Fire Station and the provision of a new Branch Station at the South end of the Borough	23,000	23,000
 
 EDUCATION COMMITTEE
 
 60	A programme of new schools and additions and alterations to existing schools which are in hand at the present time and which it is hoped to complete within three years, comprises 10 new schools and extensions and alterations to six existing schools estimated to cost:-	360,000	180,000
 61	Purchase of sites yet to be obtained for above, including Alpha Drive, Bedford Drive, Hemingford St. Brett St. but exclusive of lands now belonging to the Corporation	70,000	35,000
 
 LIBRARIES COMMITTEE
 
 I have not included the cost of the new Central Library towards the cost of which the Corporation should have a sum approaching £60,000, before building actually takes place.
 
 Totals	3,839,002	1,791,730
 
 The above-mentioned items comprise work which I have in hand in varying stages between the preparation of the preliminary designs and the supervision of the construction and completion.
 The total cost of the works is about £3,839,002, which, after deducting the grants which may be received from the Minsitry of Transport, the Board of Education, the Unemployment Grants Committee, or other sources, leaves a liability on the Corporation of £1,791,730.
 These totals, however, do not include the cost of the following works for which the total capital expenditure cannot at present be conveniently or accurately estimated.
 
 TOWN PLANNING
 
 On Town Planning an expenditure of something between £1,000 and £5,000 per annum will be incurred in connection with works which will arise out of the promotion and carrying out of a Town Planning Scheme, if the scheme be vigorously pursued and brought to fruition. In connection with this expenditure the fact should not, however, be lost sight of that any expenditure on Town Planning at the present time before the development and building up of the undeveloped area is carried out will repay the community very handsomely in the near future.
 
 I have not included expenditure by the Corporation on road-making and other private improvement expenses for which they are liable in front of places of Worship and many other similar items which are generally defrayed out of the annual expenditure on Revenue Account, nor have I included any expenditure which the Corporation may be called upon to bear in conjunction with other authorities for the drainage of the areas tributary to the Birket and Fender Brooks, and for which no definite scheme has yet been submitted, but this is an expenditure which will have to be met in the near future.
 
 I regret that owing to pressure of work in various directions in the Department it has not been possible in the time at my disposal to have plans and sections of certain of the above-mentioned works made, and data obtained, so as to prepare detailed estimates, but probably the estimates are sufficiently close for the Committee’s present purposes.
 
 (SIGNED) R.W. JOHNSTON
 Borough Engineer & Surveyor.
 
 ----------------------------------
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Oct 2007 Posts: 4,868 Forum Veteran |  
|   Forum Veteran Joined:  Oct 2007 Posts: 4,868 | 
Thanks for all the work you've put in on this. Look forward to learning more about the Great Culvert too. 
 Carpe diem.
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jan 2010 Posts: 1,916 Likes: 4 Forum Addict |  
|   Forum Addict Joined:  Jan 2010 Posts: 1,916 Likes: 4 | 
I'd like to thank you for your work here too. It is quite fascinating. How do you gain access to these documents please?
 I am interested in the original sewers mentioned in the town clerk's report. In particular there was a reference to
 
 (f) Outfall No. 6. adjoining Rock Park and draining an area of about 149 acres.
 
 I assume that this would have been interrupted by the subsequent building of the bypass and more recently I imagine it's diverted into the Dell pumping station and thence to the treatment works at Bromborough. I suspect the same thing has happened to the St Paul's road outfall, but I also suspect they they still see occasional use as storm outfall under conditions of heavy rain.
 
 I think part of the original outfall no 6 runs along the foreshore in front of the northern end of Rock park. There is a series of manholes there, and at one point a manhole cover has been replaced with a sheet of steel, which gets thrown off when there is heavy rain - I've seen a river of dilute sewage issuing from it once or twice. The incoming tide floods the tunnel which is several feet in diameter and runs parallel to the shore, then, but Ive no idea where the end of the outfall is. I guess it must be well below low water and probably has a flap valve which allows water to leave it but prevents the tide filling it. Any information on this would be gratefully received.
 
 The St Paul's road outfall can be seen from a small boat - or the ferry when it passes that way - at low tide. It runs below the road leading to the oil terminal and seems to be a pretty large tunnel maybe six feet in diameter.
 
 I look forward to the great culvert report too. Just a thought, by the way, would it be easier to scan the document(s), thereby saving yourself a shedload of typing?
 
 If you want it in typed form, then perhaps interested people here would be prepared to help converting the scanned images? I would certainly happily volunteer to do this if it helps.
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Feb 2010 Posts: 56 Member |  
| OP   Member Joined:  Feb 2010 Posts: 56 | 
Hello Excoriator
 It's strange, but the documents were amongst a pile of papers to be thrown out a number of years ago; I just thought they were interesting and rescued them. They've languished in a drawer in my desk for a while until the Tranmere Overflow Sewer issue made me revisit them.
 
 I only have a couple left; the majority, including a letter with a genuine Laird (can't remember which one) signature I sent off to be archived.
 
 The Rock Park outfall was picked up and taken back in the new (mid 1990s) Beaconsfield North Interceptor Sewer (beneath the by-pass) to the Dell and then pumped to treatment. You're right that the St. Paul's outfall is still there. I remember being given access along the Tranmere Oil Terminal jetty to have a look (had to surrender my cigarette lighter for some reason.......... ). I believe it acts as a relief overflow, as does the one at The Dell, where there is a pumping station to take foul flows to treatment.
 
 I suspect that any seawater entering the system on the foreshore at Rock Park is "doing the rounds" and ending up at The Dell, either to be pumped for treatment or discharged back to the river. Either way, a bit of a waste.
 
 As for the Reports and typing them up, I've tried Optical Character Recognition software and the result looked like something from the back side of the Rosetta Stone. Scanning and posting will work of course, but I don't think it's as nice as reading a post directly in a forum. I appreciate the offer for help, but I've already started, and as I touch-type anyway, it's not really so bad.......... bit of music on, pdf on one side of the screen, Word document on the right. I'll get there in a while.
 
 Regards
 
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jan 2010 Posts: 1,916 Likes: 4 Forum Addict |  
|   Forum Addict Joined:  Jan 2010 Posts: 1,916 Likes: 4 | 
Mr G65.
 I think the remaining part of the Rock Park outfall still operates as an overflow, as I say I've seen a veritable river emerging from a coverless manhole on the beach during heavy rain. I assume it is simultaneously pouring from the exit which is probably below water. I can see no sign of it however.
 
 In better weather it fills with a dramatic whirlpool on the incoming tide (this takes perhaps 20 minutes to complete, through a 2 foot square manhole, so there is a fair volume to be filled) As the tide goes out it empties and the cycle repeats. One can look down into the tunnel when the tide is out which is brick lined I think and it runs parallel to the river wall. One can trace its route along as there are leaks (and i think partial collapses) from which air is expelled as it fills with water. But the trail ends about halfway along the Rock Ferry Esplanade. I don't think there is a connection from this to the Dell pumping station.
 
 Currently the hole is covered with a steel plate - somebody has decided it is potentially dangerous which it cetainly would be if you fell in - but it will be thrown off again next time there is very heavy rain no doubt.
 
 Also about halfway along the Rock Ferry Esplanade is sort of stone 'box' projecting from the wall. This too was covered with a steel plate which has corroded through. there seems to be surface water running through the bottom of this. During rain, one can hear water running through it. This too might be a storm outfall, for again in heavy rain I've seen sewage emerging from it in large quantities. Whether it ends up in the same tunnel I have no idea. I have picked this up thanks to dog-walking, not dedicated examination or research by the way. Twice a day I walk along with dog, rain or shine, and have simply noticed whirlpools and bubbles. Incidentally, the trail of bubbles does a sharp left at the pier end and goes under the wall inland. I suspect it may have originally come from Rock lane or Bedford Road. Rock Lane (East and West) has a characteristic trail of ventilated manholes in the middle of the road. I can't recall if Bedford Road has them for sure, but I think I've seen them there too.
 
 I remember the dell pumping station being built, and apart from its own outfall which involved partly tunnelling and partly cut and cover of three foot diameter concrete pipe down to a portal at low water there was no other interception work done on the beach.
 
 I look forward to reading the stuff on the great culvert in due course though. That must have been quite a project to build!
 
 Regards
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
_jase_
 Unregistered |  
| _jase_ Unregistered | 
Great read guys thanks for Info....       |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Feb 2010 Posts: 56 Member |  
| OP   Member Joined:  Feb 2010 Posts: 56 | 
This is drifting away from the original "Birkenhead Sewerage" topic I think, towards your   Rock Ferry foreshore   posts  , but just to respond. I've mentioned the Beaconsfied North Interceptor Sewer in another thread,   Interceptor link   which picks up ALL outfalls from St. Paul's Road south up to and including the old Dell outfall. The majority of the outfalls were retained as emergency overflows. Two old combined sewers come out at Rock Park, under the foreshore for a short distance, then turn at right angles north and south to meet at a point from where the old outfall took flow out into the River. The design to deal with these involved a tunnelled connection back to the main interceptor sewer under the A41. The Dell outfall acts as an emergency storm overflow, and legislation at the time meant it had to be extended to Mean Low Water Spring Tides. |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jan 2010 Posts: 1,916 Likes: 4 Forum Addict |  
|   Forum Addict Joined:  Jan 2010 Posts: 1,916 Likes: 4 | 
MrG65
 Sorry if I'm diverting your sewerage. I'll happily start a new thread on the Rock Park Sewerage system. Let me know if you would like me to do this.
 
 Are you saying that the tunnel under the foreshore I have seen evidence for has been intercepted and now flows back into the Dell Pumping Station via the A41? I agree that the original sewers were probably intercepted but this is somewhat different. It is the storm overflows I am interested in. Where is this outfall? It seems unlikely from what I know to lead back into the Dell sump.
 
 It is generally possible to see where (relatively) freshwater outfalls are even at high tide. The sewage makes its way to the surface and can be seen at - say - the Dell and Beaconsfield outfalls. Additional evidence is that they often attract the attention of hungry gulls.
 
 The Dell pumping station is supposed to be unmanned. However, it often has a clutch of United Utility vans parked near it, and seems to require considerable attention. I will call in and ask the people there what the connection is. It may well be that you are right and that they are unaware of where the thousands of gallons of seawater they are processing daily is coming from.
 
 
 |  |  |  
 
| 
 
| 
  Click to View Topic.
 |  |  
| 
|
 | 
Posts: 236 
Joined: May 2009
 |  |  
| 
 
| There are no members with birthdays on this day. |  |  | 
 |