Forums65
Topics76,514
Posts1,034,194
Members14,915
|
Most Online121,890 Sep 24th, 2025
|
|
7 members (2 invisible),
11,328
guests, and
479
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,315 Likes: 1
Wiki Master
|
Wiki Master
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,315 Likes: 1 |
Horrible, same as all current Ford tat. Just another manufacturer trying to cash in on a long-lost once famous brand name, without any regard whatsoever for the original.
And don't tell me, it will have a little shitty 1.2 engine in it, far away from the classic 1.6 and 2.8i days.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,683
Wiki Guide
|
Wiki Guide
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,683 |
By the way, Auto Express is the motoring equivalent of The Sun and The Star, it's absolute shite. They 'brought us' the new Calibra, and then the Subaru 'hot hatch', when in fact it was just a photoshop/3D render on someone's website. ![[Linked Image]](http://photos.autoexpress.co.uk/images/front_picture_library_UK/dir_440/car_photo_220224_5.jpg) ![[Linked Image]](http://www.3dluvr.com/grid/gallery/ImprezaHatchback_HR_05___.jpg)
"C20 LET bang"
|
|
|
Click to View Topic.
|
|
Posts: 60
Joined: October 2008
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|