We know that developers want prime land, views, open spaces and nice respectable areas.. don't we ?
Not at all, developers want dirt cheap land for bulk house building. Hence they end up with problems like those at The Oaks, Ellesmere Port where there was a recorded history of surface water flooding. Prime expensive land is only used for a very small percentage of house building.
Look at where the bulk housing is being built at the moment. Tranmere (clearance land), Rock Ferry (clearance land), Bromborough (ex-industrial), the North End (clearance land). A lot of developments that in the pipeline are also in sub-prime areas.
Going up-market a bit you get sites like Fisher's Lane, Pensby which can't be described as prime land with a view and open spaces, how many houses will they put there? Eight flats and seven house which doesn't even knock a dent in the Government imposed housing target, you would need to allocate 750 sites that size to meet the target.
The biggest developments in the area (albeit not Wirral) are at Ellesmere Port and Hooton both large ex-industrial sites and both beside railways (which I personally wouldn't mind but others do).
Looking at Hooton, this is a massive site yet only provides 265 homes, the only similar size brownfield land we have is at the old Bidston Dock but that is earmarked for commercial use. We need 45 sites of that size to meet the housing targets.
Wirral just hasn't got the space for the ridiculous targets the Government has set, its no use building houses on industrial land all the time because then you end up with a shortage of jobs because of the lack of industrial land. If greenbelt is going to be invaded its better it is with houses rather than industry which tends to have much taller and imposing buildings.