closure of council kennels proposal - 9th Nov 2012 5:30pm
Just received this email from council and this suggestion is one of the ways of making cuts!
DESCRIPTION OF OPTION
This option proposes that the Council Kennels/Warden Service should consider being
part of the Merseyside consortium service for the collection and retention of dogs.
RATIONALE FOR SAVINGS
The council operates a collection service during office hours and a standby service
outside normal hours.
A Merseyside Consortium (Liverpool, Knowsley, Halton and Sefton) jointly pay a
private contractor to deliver both the out of hours and kennelling service.
The members of the Merseyside Consortium pay approximately £235,000 for this
service which operates from Halewood. This contract is due to be re-tendered and
should Wirral be included, would provide the potential to meet statutory requirements at
lower cost than the existing council service.
IMPACT
There are likely to be a number of logistical and practical hurdles to investigate if this
option was pursued and to meet its statutory obligations the authority. Five employees
are risk from this proposal, though Wirral may have to still employ one Dog Warden
supplementary to this contract (as in Sefton model)
Under these arrangements the kennels in Wirral would close and owners would need
to travel to Halewood to collect their pet. This could be a disincentive to such reclaims.
The capacity of any new arrangements would also need to be considered so as to
ensure that there is proper capacity to cope with demand and to retain animals for a
suitable period.
In terms of implications for voluntary, community and faith groups, the “Friends Group”
will have a particular interest in this proposal and should be specifically included in the
consultation.
In addition to the above, the transport of dogs to the site in Halewood would increase
carbon emissions from road transport.
This proposal could potentially have a one off saving of £100,000 in year 2014/15.
MITIGATION
There are additional options as to how this service could be delivered differently.
These include:
The potential to reduce the operating costs of the service through reducing the
availability of the acceptance point arrangements from 24 hr availability to a cut off at
10pm or later.
The Kennels operating through an RSPCA affiliated organisation at Cross Lane.
Discussions have taken place concerning co-operation between the council and that
organisation.
DESCRIPTION OF OPTION
This option proposes that the Council Kennels/Warden Service should consider being
part of the Merseyside consortium service for the collection and retention of dogs.
RATIONALE FOR SAVINGS
The council operates a collection service during office hours and a standby service
outside normal hours.
A Merseyside Consortium (Liverpool, Knowsley, Halton and Sefton) jointly pay a
private contractor to deliver both the out of hours and kennelling service.
The members of the Merseyside Consortium pay approximately £235,000 for this
service which operates from Halewood. This contract is due to be re-tendered and
should Wirral be included, would provide the potential to meet statutory requirements at
lower cost than the existing council service.
IMPACT
There are likely to be a number of logistical and practical hurdles to investigate if this
option was pursued and to meet its statutory obligations the authority. Five employees
are risk from this proposal, though Wirral may have to still employ one Dog Warden
supplementary to this contract (as in Sefton model)
Under these arrangements the kennels in Wirral would close and owners would need
to travel to Halewood to collect their pet. This could be a disincentive to such reclaims.
The capacity of any new arrangements would also need to be considered so as to
ensure that there is proper capacity to cope with demand and to retain animals for a
suitable period.
In terms of implications for voluntary, community and faith groups, the “Friends Group”
will have a particular interest in this proposal and should be specifically included in the
consultation.
In addition to the above, the transport of dogs to the site in Halewood would increase
carbon emissions from road transport.
This proposal could potentially have a one off saving of £100,000 in year 2014/15.
MITIGATION
There are additional options as to how this service could be delivered differently.
These include:
The potential to reduce the operating costs of the service through reducing the
availability of the acceptance point arrangements from 24 hr availability to a cut off at
10pm or later.
The Kennels operating through an RSPCA affiliated organisation at Cross Lane.
Discussions have taken place concerning co-operation between the council and that
organisation.