Forums65
Topics76,364
Posts1,033,327
Members14,584
|
Most Online16,551 Feb 2nd, 2024
|
|
15 members (3 invisible),
12,299
guests, and
960
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
S |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#94374
22nd Feb 2005 12:07pm
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,002
Wiki Master
|
OP
Wiki Master
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,002 |
What If There Were No Hypothetical Questions?
|
|
|
#94375
22nd Feb 2005 4:00pm
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,912
Forum Master
|
Forum Master
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,912 |
Incredible, couldn't find out what the difference in fuel consumption was compared to regular 4-strokes though. If it's not much different we could be looking at a new breed of performance engine! 4.5KGm of torque @ 3500rpm, what's that in lb/ft?
|
|
|
#94376
22nd Feb 2005 11:04pm
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,238
Wiki Addict
|
Wiki Addict
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,238 |
Looks like it is an abandoned project that.Great idea tho.Would it make tuning easier or harder.Cams cant be done,suppose u could bore out the inlet and exhaust tracts and get fatter in/out pistons to compensate.Mmmmmm?
|
|
|
Click to View Topic.
|
|
Posts: 2,283
Joined: December 2010
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|