|
Forums65
Topics76,516
Posts1,034,197
Members14,917
| |
Most Online121,890
Sep 24th, 2025
|
|
|
9 members (4 invisible),
53,851
guests, and
1,092
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,113
Forum Addict
|
OP
Forum Addict
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,113 |
Britain's most senior traffic policeman is to be prosecuted for speeding, his force said on Tuesday.
Meredydd Hughes, head of roads policing for the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo), was allegedly caught driving at 90mph in a 60mph zone in North Wales while on holiday last May.
A spokeswoman for South Yorkshire Police said: "Chief Constable Meredydd Hughes has received a notice of prosecution in respect of an alleged driving offence in North Wales in the early morning of a bank holiday Monday in May while on holiday.
"No summons has yet been received."
The force has not given any indication whether Mr Hughes intends to fight the prosecution.
North Wales Police said it would not confirm any details on a case before it went to court.
Mustang
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,992
Forum Guardian
|
|
Forum Guardian
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,992 |
is it gonna be one rule for him and one for joe public tho ?....
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,002
Wiki Master
|
|
Wiki Master
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,002 |
was allegedly caught driving at 90mph in a 60mph zone in North Wales while on holiday last May. Well I doubt he can afford a top solicitor - I just hope he can afford the fine 
Last edited by StuyMac; 30th Oct 2007 6:38pm.
What If There Were No Hypothetical Questions?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,992
Forum Guardian
|
|
Forum Guardian
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,315 Likes: 1
Wiki Master
|
|
Wiki Master
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,315 Likes: 1 |
Whilst I will agree, a lot of people do speeds like that, especially on "faster roads" and it may not have been particuarly dangerous dependent on what the conditions were like etc, I think police officer's, especially higher up ones, should be setting an example and I hope that he gets the maximum penalty possible for his actions. The laws the law at the end of the day and the police are there not only to enforce it, but one would also like to think they promote it and set a good example to other people even when not in uniform/on duty. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,113
Forum Addict
|
|
OP
Forum Addict
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,113 |
is it gonna be one rule for him and one for joe public tho ?.... far from it...joe public arent in a postion whereby a) they have it annnounced to the world that they are being "investigated" for speeding... b) he could also possibly get done under police conduct rules....so in effect its a double whammy! BUT there might be a few flaws...obviously we havent the full facts .. but if it happened in may the Force is obliged to serve the Notice of Intended prosecution within 14 days of the offence on the driver (there are few exceptions such as company car drivers etc) AND a summons would have to be raised wthin 6 months of the offence....may-nov? 6 months...hmmm so if he is summonsed for the offence there could be legitimate defences he may use...as could any member of the public... nothing to do with his postion/job. Just thought it may amuse!
Mustang
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,113
Forum Addict
|
|
OP
Forum Addict
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,113 |
Whilst I will agree, a lot of people do speeds like that, especially on "faster roads" and it may not have been particuarly dangerous dependent on what the conditions were like etc, I think police officer's, especially higher up ones, should be setting an example and I hope that he gets the maximum penalty possible for his actions. The laws the law at the end of the day and the police are there not only to enforce it, but one would also like to think they promote it and set a good example to other people even when not in uniform/on duty. hear hear!
Mustang
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,868
Forum Veteran
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,868 |
AND a summons would have to be raised wthin 6 months of the offence....may-nov? 6 months...hmmm
Yes, but the summons was apparently issued in October, within the 6 months. The case doesn't have to be heard within 6 months.
Carpe diem.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,113
Forum Addict
|
|
OP
Forum Addict
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,113 |
"No summons has yet been received."
er....now im confused!
Mustang
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 21,269 Likes: 4
Wiki Master
|
|
Wiki Master
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 21,269 Likes: 4 |
Me too lol Where's the info coming from "Source" ? Remember this one ? Click Me Out come of this "Police Chief" will be very interesting indeed. I wonder if he will use the barrister that get the celebs off there speeding tickets.?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,868
Forum Veteran
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,868 |
Yes, the article seems to contradict itself. In one place it says "no summons has yet been received" & in another paragraph "summoned to appear at Wrexham on 21st. November" http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/7069289.stm
Carpe diem.
|
|
|
Click to View Topic.
|
|
|
Posts: 60
Joined: October 2008
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
![[Linked Image]](http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g193/ibizachic/ChiccyIG.jpg)
![[Linked Image]](http://photowirral.com/newsig.jpg)
