I've no proper idea, I just made sure I had a court order saying my ex couldn't take from my pension. I'd guess the normal sort of equation of how many years married against how many years he earned pension gives the fraction then divide by two?
Only against company pension.
Eg 30 years gaining pension 20 years married (of those same years). £12,000 pension pa.
20/30 = 0.666666
0.666666 * £12000= £8000
Your half of £8000 is £4000 pa, he keeps £8000 pa
Last edited by diggingdeeper; 3rd May 201910:09pm.
We don't do charity in Germany, we pay taxes. Charity is a failure of governments' responsibilities - Henning Wehn
Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves. All things are bound together. All things connect. ~Chief Seattle
Maybe time to take stock and realise how lucky we are in this country. Climate change the world over.
Syria refugee camp , but there are floods of biblical proportions all over the middle east in the last twelve months . Iran had almost 3 weeks of torrential rain covered most of the country, although had drought for a number of years. Really very scary and very sad.
Iran March 2019
Turkey 2018
Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves. All things are bound together. All things connect. ~Chief Seattle
At least hes a experienced meteoroligist ( who bet for years on the suns activity controlling weather and won thousands ) as he says follow the money " carbon taxes, club of rome rothchilds connections etc etc "
Theres so much hypocrisy in the false scam hysteria of CC like emma thompson patronising us then flying 1st class home , ed village idiot milliband ranting about doing something then flying 19000 hrs a year....you couldnt make it up
Ive just seen a great interview with john ackers ( not a scientist ) against piers corbyn 10 years ago.....on sky news. Piers constantly challenges him or any " gravy train hysteria " follow the sheep CC people to an open public debate .....piers batters him with data yet ackers just waffles the usual " most scientists think CC is 100 % real " BS. Piers says his usual " co2 doesnt drive weather or storms or sea levels etc , weve been cooling " Ackers comes up with nothing just " were at a tipping point & piers is a maverick " You find this alot on youtube , CC alarmists just abuse people who have data to back themselves up. Why ? Cause they have nothing. One interview in the US the CC alarmist just walked out cause he had no argument except " we all think this "