Our Success is in our members who value our strength as a valued community.
Forum Statistics
Posts1,015,079
Topics74,917
Members12,919
Forums66
Posts in last 24hrs13
Most Online7,831
Apr 8th, 2013
Who's Online Now
46 registered members (alan128, 8 invisible), 1,231 guests, and335 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Social Media : Follow Us


Popular Topics(Views 7days)
New General Forums
Judy Then Punch
by diggingdeeper. 24th Mar 2019 2:04am
You can please some of the .....
by diggingdeeper. 22nd Mar 2019 6:43am
New Peter Rabbit Coin
by granny. 20th Mar 2019 11:34am
The Bedroom Scene
by granny. 20th Mar 2019 10:26am
New Wirral History
Manifolds, Wilsons. Meacocks & Barnes - 1820s
by bliplandy. 20th Mar 2019 6:18am
Wirral Street??
by gerrymoore. 16th Mar 2019 2:58pm
WW2 USNavy large sheepskin trousers
by Bultaco. 15th Mar 2019 8:48am
Where is/was this Station Hotel
by derekdwc. 13th Mar 2019 11:44am
Grove Hotel, Wallasey
by diggingdeeper. 9th Mar 2019 9:01pm
Forum Tips
Photo Gallery Forums
WW1 Monument, Birkenhead
No more bridge, never be the same
Topic Replies
Exploring with fighters ... on the ferry
by GaryFromWirral. 26th Mar 2019 12:05am
New Brighton Tunnels ??
by GaryFromWirral. 26th Mar 2019 12:02am
Rescued Animals.
by cools. 25th Mar 2019 7:13pm
Another "Austerity" Measure
by svenlock68. 25th Mar 2019 4:48pm
Bouncey thing
by Bultaco. 25th Mar 2019 4:12pm
Creative Gigaworks T40 Series II Speakers
by Catsick. 25th Mar 2019 1:22pm
HP Envy 13.3 Laptop AD059NA
by Catsick. 25th Mar 2019 1:22pm
What song are you listening to?
by _Ste_. 25th Mar 2019 1:13am
Builder problems, advice needed
by _Ste_. 24th Mar 2019 11:52pm
March
M T W T F S S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Recent Posts : What's On ?
Wirral History Fair
by missmahjong. 12th Mar 2019 3:07pm
RAF Tornado Farewell Flypast Tour
by diggingdeeper. 28th Feb 2019 10:14am
Previous Topic
Next Topic
Print Topic
Rating 5
Wallasey CLP Suspension Twaddle #1024554
23rd Oct 2016 8:53pm
23rd Oct 2016 8:53pm
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446
Here.
RUDEBOX Offline OP
Wiki Master
RUDEBOX  Offline OP
Wiki Master
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446
Here.

Wow. Our fellow blog, Skwawkbox, has apparently obtained a copy of the official report into events at Wallasey Labour Party by Labour’s National Executive Committee and it is shaming – for the NEC.

I write “apparently”, not to suggest in any way that I disbelieve the Skwawkbox. Its writer and I have been friends online for many years now, and I consider him to be utterly reliable.


It’s just that I find it hard to believe that a senior member of an organisation that claims to be reputable could produce such a work of fiction and expect it to be taken seriously.

If I were a member of Wallasey CLP, I would be incandescent with anger right now – not only at the false claims made against that organisation, but also at the recommendations made at the end, which I understand the NEC’s disputes panel has accepted in full. On what grounds, when the report is so full of falsehoods, inaccuracies and misdirection?

Here are six of them:



1. The report suggests that the atmosphere in Wallasey CLP had become hostile due to an influx of new members who had different ideas about the way meetings should be run than some of the more long-term members.

Calls for a different – but also perfectly correct – approach to meetings may generate heated debate but that is not the same as saying newcomers were creating a hostile atmosphere.

My own CLP had a couple of very heated debates last weekend, over motions I had drafted on behalf of my branch – but the heat directed at the issues under discussion, not the people discussing them. Big difference, and one that leads me to ask: Were the writers of this report looking for an excuse?

Considering the claims about calls to deselect councillors, this seems possible.

As the Skwawkbox points out, CLP members are well within their rights to complain about their councillors, to campaign for them to change their policies or even to call for their deselection – or the deselection of an MP. That is not a matter in which disciplinary procedures may be justified; those people are exercising a democratic right.

But Skwawkbox raises an important point:

What the above … does provide is motive: councillors fully expecting to be deselected because of an influx of highly-engaged new members might understandably wish to exploit any opportunity to neutralise that democratic threat – just as an MP who knew she faced an emphatic vote of no-confidence and eventual deselection might.
2. Next is the allegation that a CLP member threatened another with violence when all members apart from delegates were asked to leave the Annual General Meeting. The report states:

“It has been reported by several respondents that one member loudly threatened physical violence to another member during this period. Whilst it is unlikely that this threat would have been carried through, this created a frightening atmosphere…”
Really? Or is that just the impression we are intended to have? Let’s fill in a few of the details the report omits. It seems the person who threatened violence was a very small woman at the front of the room – in response to a loud insult from a very large man at the back. Skwawkbox‘s verdict:

A small woman shouted across a room at a big, mouthy man[*], “shut your mouth or I’ll shut it for you”, or words to that effect. While this kind of behaviour in a public meeting cannot be condoned (and is likely to result in disciplinary action), it would not constitute grounds for serious general alarm to most people – let alone for the suspension of a CLP of many hundreds of members.
So now we’re getting a picture of a CLP whose members say and do whatever they please – up to and including threats of violence. An inaccurate picture, as we have also seen; heated debates, opposition to certain representatives and a large man being threatened by a small woman are not to be taken as serious signs of a CLP in crisis.

But they do help to build up a false narrative leading up to the next allegation.

3. This is one of the better-known claims – that Angela Eagle was subjected to homophobic abuse at the same meeting.

But there are serious problems with the claim. Firstly, Ms Eagle was not present – therefore it is impossible for her to have been subjected to the abuse.

Secondly, it is alleged that three people – in separate parts of the meeting room and independently of each other – used the same word. But nobody sitting near them will accept this claim; they actively assert that it was not said.

In the context of the atmosphere of hostility that the report has tried to create, maybe this seems possible. But there was no atmosphere of hostility in Wallasey CLP and This Writer can only agree with the Skwawkbox‘s verdict:

That 3 people would each, independently, in separate parts of the room and on separate occasions, use the same epithet, without being heard by most of those immediately around them and about a person who was not even present is almost unimaginable.
4. Ah, but these are not the only allegations of abuse; it has been rife within the CLP, according to the NEC report, which states:

“One member in particular has endured a significant level of personal abuse. A hashtag was created to encourage people to ‘shame’ him publicly and his home address and personal details were published online. It is likely that this had a substantial detrimental impact on the member’s family. A website appears to have engaged in a course of intimidating behaviour to this member.”
In order to sustain its narrative – that the “hostile” atmosphere in Wallasey CLP is the responsibility of “new members” who support Jeremy Corbyn (this is implied by the alleged abusers’ alleged opposition to Angela Eagle, who opposed Mr Corbyn at the time) – the abused person would need to be an Eagle supporter. But- well, here’s Skwawkbox again:

According to sources within the CLP, far from being an Eagle supporter abused by ‘hard left’ Corbyn supporters, the ‘one member in particular’ is a young man of 16 or 17 years of age who started an online petition calling for the resignation of Ms Eagle.
So it seems that, in order to justify its narrative of abuse against Ms Eagle and her supporters, the author of the NEC’s report has falsified the evidence.

I’m going to skim past the section about the broken window as I have covered this in depth elsewhere. Skwawkbox makes good points – especially in the part pointing out that, with a choice of two Labour Party office windows – one easily marked out with a sticker – it seems hard to believe that someone who wanted to attack Ms Eagle’s constituency office would have broken the window of the communal stairwell between them.

5. Instead, let’s concentrate on the abuse Ms Eagle’s staff are alleged to have received. The report states:

“The office received a death threat for Angela Eagle, for which a man has been arrested. Instead of condemning this and supporting the MP and the office staff receiving this, members have questioned whether this really occurred.
“Even if one did not believe these events happened, the comradely response would be to support fellow members in true distress. Members instead went to the press to insinuate that the allegations were lies.”
Pot, kettle, black – or, if you like, “do as I say, not as I do”. No evidence has been provided that the “many hundreds of abusive, homophobic and frightening messages” the NEC’s report claims were sent to Ms Eagle’s office originated with members of the Wallasey Labour Party – just as there is no credible evidence that members hurled homophobic abuse at her during the AGM, no credible evidence that there is an atmosphere of hostility in Wallasey CLP, and no evidence at all that members of the same CLP hurled a brick through Ms Eagle’s office window.

Both sides went to the press. Ms Eagle was the first to do so; perhaps that is why her opponents in the party followed suit. As Skwawkbox points out:

Even assuming the distress was true, this claim is ironic in the extreme when one considers that the allegations of homophobic and other abuse were given to national print and broadcast media by Ms Eagle and/or her supporters.
Before coming to the report’s recommendations, let’s look at the final sentence:

“This report should not be used to exacerbate problems. Claims and counter-claims will not improve the environment, and we will not act on unsubstantiated allegations.”
Skwawkbox comments:

Considering that Ms Eagle’s immediate response to the report was to use it to justify herself via a verbal, political attack on some of her CLP members in front of television cameras and print journalists, she is now in line for censure.
That is quite correct, and I certainly hope a motion to that effect is sent to the NEC at once.

As many of her fellow Progress members leapt to publicly reinforce the impression that the alleged abuse was real and to use it to undermine Jeremy Corbyn and his supporters, they should be equally liable to sanction.
That is also correct. Skwawkbox has published social media posts by some of these politicians, who include Gloria de Piero, Caroline Flint, and Karen Buck – all of whom should receive the same treatment for ignoring the wishes of the report’s author.

So there you have it: Falsehoods, inaccuracies and misdirection – all accepted as the honest truth by the NEC’s disputes panel in a decision that makes no sense at all.

Except – wait, what’s this?

The report makes several recommendations, including a call for the CLP to be suspended subject to a review in the spring. It says: “During the suspension, any candidate selection should be conducted by the Regional Board.”

What was that suggested motive for the suspension of Wallasey CLP and the investigation that produced this worthless report, again?

Councillors fully expecting to be deselected because of an influx of highly-engaged new members might understandably wish to exploit any opportunity to neutralise that democratic threat – just as an MP who knew she faced an emphatic vote of no-confidence and eventual deselection might.
What we have here is a clear attack on democracy, namely the Wallasey CLP members’ democratic right to choose their own Parliamentary candidate. This has been about keeping Angela Eagle in her job, against the wishes of her own fellow Labour members.

We really need the names of the people on the NEC’s disputes panel and a record of the vote by which this report was accepted – because anybody who supported it is under suspicion alongside Ms Eagle and the MPs mentioned above, who supported her on the social media.

And then we need an independent investigation into the behaviour and motives of all participants in this fiasco.

Oh yes – if you want to read the full report to the NEC, here it is.

Source: Exclusive: Labour NEC’s full #Wallasey investigation report – and what it leaves out | The SKWAWKBOX Blog

[*] There’s that word “mouthy” again – and being applied to a man. Wasn’t This Writer attacked by certain people for using it to describe Jess Phillips over the summer – people who refused to accept that it wasn’t a gender-specific term? One can only question what they have to say about this use of it – and conclude that the answer is, most likely, nothing. It would not help their narrow-minded cause.

Yes, I am still angry about that, and rightly.

http://voxpoliticalonline.com/2016/...stigation-of-wallasey-clp-it-is-twaddle/

Contrasting report in Mainstream Media : http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/angela-eagle-subject-homophobic-abuse-12045600



Mia Mabel

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh! Jer-e-my Cor-byn

Google Ads
Re: Wallasey CLP Suspension Twaddle [Re: RUDEBOX] #1024649
25th Oct 2016 5:00pm
25th Oct 2016 5:00pm
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,631
wirral
E
Excoriator Offline
Forum Addict
Excoriator  Offline
Forum Addict
E
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,631
wirral
Where does the brick sit in this discussion?

Had it come through the window of her office, wrapped in a threatening note addressed, then one might conclude that it was indeed directed towards her. (It didn't)

Had it come through her office window unwrapped, then one might conclude that it was likely that it was directed at her. (It didn't)

It actually came through a window of a building in which her office - along with others - was located, which makes the probability of it being Eagle-directed much, much lower. So how come the report concluded it was directed towards her? I cannot see how even very extensive consideration can come to any sensible conclusion about who threw it or at whom without new evidence emerging. It doesn't seem to have done, and in fact, the flying brick has been a huge asset to theEagle camp who have used it assiduously to gather support for her.

Re: Wallasey CLP Suspension Twaddle [Re: RUDEBOX] #1024660
25th Oct 2016 9:35pm
25th Oct 2016 9:35pm
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 12,438
Birkenhead
diggingdeeper Offline

Wiki Master
diggingdeeper  Offline

Wiki Master
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 12,438
Birkenhead
Yep three possibilities ...

A random idiot threw the brick.
A Corbyn supporter threw the brick.
An Eagle supporter threw the brick.

Its obvious which one would gain the most out of this action which is now backed up by the after-effects.

Its also obvious who gains the least which has also been backed up by after-effects.


In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell

We should judge our economy by the absence of poverty, not the number of billionaires - Jeremy Corbyn
Re: Wallasey CLP Suspension Twaddle [Re: RUDEBOX] #1025649
11th Nov 2016 3:54pm
11th Nov 2016 3:54pm
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446
Here.
RUDEBOX Offline OP
Wiki Master
RUDEBOX  Offline OP
Wiki Master
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446
Here.


Mia Mabel

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh! Jer-e-my Cor-byn


Moderated by  Mod 

Random Wirral Images

Click to View Topic.
Newest Topics
New Brighton Tunnels ??
by GaryFromWirral. 26th Mar 2019 12:02am
Ladybird Books on Brexit
by granny. 24th Mar 2019 11:22pm
Another "Austerity" Measure
by diggingdeeper. 24th Mar 2019 6:18pm
Bouncey thing
by Bultaco. 24th Mar 2019 11:42am
Cruel ear cropping breeders moved to Bromborough
by venice. 21st Mar 2019 4:10pm
For Sale & Free
Mothercare Journey travel system pram Teal colour
by lauren_lfc89. 24th Mar 2019 7:34pm
Milwaukee fuel drill, other tools available!!!
by anniebo28. 24th Mar 2019 3:54pm
125cc scooter
by vw_kyle. 12th Mar 2019 8:13am
KTM Mancina Action 272 27.5 Inch Electric Mountain
by ianyam. 10th Mar 2019 12:04pm
Cambridge hifi Amplifiers for sale - from £40
by montyz. 8th Mar 2019 11:36am
Member Spotlight
snowshoes
snowshoes
ottawa canada ( formerly new brighton )
Posts: 889
Joined: August 2010
Show All Member Profiles 
Newest Members
Berlin, Lizardking, Biffaskin, Skinnyfizzy1981, dagc176
12919 Registered Users
Today's Birthdays
lansyp (51)
New Wirral Info
Bouncey thing
by Bultaco. 24th Mar 2019 11:42am
Amazon £5 Off Today
by diggingdeeper. 19th Mar 2019 6:25pm
Best Place for A True Story
by granny. 18th Mar 2019 7:35pm
New Council Tax bill 2019
by keef666. 18th Mar 2019 11:13am
Roofer recommendation please?
by Gold_Moon. 15th Mar 2019 4:09pm
News : New Topics
Another "Austerity" Measure
by diggingdeeper. 24th Mar 2019 6:18pm
Handbag Found in New Brighton
by daveybm. 19th Mar 2019 8:46am
Handbag Found in New Brighton
by daveybm. 18th Mar 2019 9:43am
Giant rabbit startles motorist.
by Excoriator. 17th Mar 2019 9:58am
Stabbing
by cools. 16th Mar 2019 9:38pm
New Enthusiast Forums
Ladybird Books on Brexit
by granny. 24th Mar 2019 11:22pm
Cruel ear cropping breeders moved to Bromborough
by venice. 21st Mar 2019 4:10pm
Wirral dog groomer.
by venice. 21st Mar 2019 2:28pm
DNS Not found Error.
by Windows. 14th Mar 2019 12:54pm
Bultaco pursang
by Bultaco. 13th Mar 2019 12:43pm
Popular Topics(Views 24hrs)
Wirral Sunrise Sunset
Sunrise Tue 5:59am
Sunset Tue 6:36pm
Local Time Tue 12:05am
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1.1