Wow
I know ive seen and i'm sure a lot of people have seen
the cases on soap tv where the person cant be treated
because of no paper work ie medical insurance.
Do you have prove insurance before treatment?
And if not what's stopping you legging it after giving false details?
Just shows how lucky we are in a lot of respects.
Thanks to Bill Clinton during his terms in office, there is now *Federal* legislation in place which says that any hospital *has* to at least "stabilise" someone who is taken there, irrespective of whether or not they can pay.
As regards proving insurance before treatment, well yes, if you're in any fit state to be asked, they will want to photocopy the card that your health insurance company gives you before treatment starts. If you're in sufficient trouble that they can't do that, then it's unlikely you're going to be legging it anywhere. Most people in the USA carry their health insurance card with them anytime they go out of the house.
I suspect that if you were taken into hospital and you weren't already on their records, they'd try to get a copy of your drivers licence, which is used as the standard photo ID in the USA, if you said you were uninsured.
If you wanted to do a runner, then you don't have to pay on the spot, and sure, you could try keeping one step ahead of the collection agencies, and then the police. Wouldn't recommend it, though.
The American health care system *is* a disgrace, at least in the way in which it's billed. I do have to say that it's *far* more responsive to non-urgent cases than the NHS. It's very rare to wait more than two weeks for an appointment, in my experience.
Mention socialised health care over here and you will very quickly get howled down, the funny (almost!) thing is that America DOES generally have socialised health care, it's in place for the vast majority of pensioners, and there are a lot of state schemes for children who would be otherwise uninsured.
They could go a long way to fixing the current system if they just switched to a single-payer (i.e. government run) national scheme, though you'd have a hell of a lot of unemployed administrators to take care of afterwards, and of course nationalising anything over here would probably provoke an even worse reaction than socialised health care.
Like I said before, as far as I'm concerned, it's a close thing for where I prefer to live. If you could take the best from both countries, then the result would be a REALLY nice place to live...
Brian.