Forums
Posted By: AX_125 Sexy or not? - 11th Oct 2004 10:28am
Even though i have sold my AX, and will probably never drive another one again, i will always have a soft spot for the little underrated hot-hatches.

I know they are ugly cars but, is it just me or is this a very sexy AX?

Fast as fook, apparently 0-60 in 6ish seconds.

http://www.sussexcarz.com/cars/glenn/glenn.htm
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Sexy or not? - 11th Oct 2004 10:36am
its just you <img border="0" alt="[Roll around the floor laffin]" title="" src="graemlins/cwemotions065.gif" />

for the amount of time and money spent on the outside he could of updated the interior a little at least :rolleyes:
Posted By: Dazza Re: Sexy or not? - 11th Oct 2004 10:39am
Dont like it, still like a cerealbox. Agree w/ Adam that the money spend could of been better spent
Posted By: AX_125 Re: Sexy or not? - 11th Oct 2004 10:39am
Weight saving, this is a 550kg car, probs less than half yours and mine.

I am sure if he wanted a nice inside he would of bought a Lexus.

Personally i like the rally look, this car and about 30 odd AX's will be at Demon Tweeks meet on the 30th of october. I am going to take a trip there, will be funny i think.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Sexy or not? - 11th Oct 2004 10:43am
weight saving doesnt mean the dash has to look ugly. could have made an effort to put some effort into making it look better, like he has with the outside. im sure if he was that bothered about saving weight he'd of used lighter rims and not bothered with heavy body modifications.
Posted By: Dazza Re: Sexy or not? - 11th Oct 2004 10:45am
True, or carbon fibre
Posted By: AX_125 Re: Sexy or not? - 11th Oct 2004 10:49am
Apparently he is going to be modifying the rear end.

Maybe insides are next on the list.
Posted By: Cali_16v Re: Sexy or not? - 11th Oct 2004 11:06am
liking the pug 106 gti engine, thats it
Posted By: AL Re: Sexy or not? - 11th Oct 2004 4:34pm
For an AX it looks realy well done particularly the outside, I too like rally interiors but also a bit of comfort and safety!
Posted By: jimbo4x4 Re: Sexy or not? - 11th Oct 2004 6:53pm
Stickin with sporty, but the rear end does need work to match up with the rest of the car
Posted By: Whitterz Re: Sexy or not? - 11th Oct 2004 6:58pm
nice smile
Posted By: aceritz Re: Sexy or not? - 12th Oct 2004 9:57am
i too have a soft spot for ax's, the poor little cars just dont suit the twin headlights,
once the back is sorted that will be enough for me.
oh and lots of cow skin inside for me personally, and a bit of comfort.

These little cars fly for wot they are
Posted By: DavidB Re: Sexy or not? - 17th Oct 2004 5:10pm
Thos AX's are horrid little things, but that looks really nice. The front looks amazing, that's the first frontal I've seen that looks better than the original.
Will the 1.9 GTi engine fit in an AX, is that why he went for the 1.6 I wonder?

Weight saving: A dashboard weighs about a third the weight of a person. The difference in the handling will be very noticable.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Sexy or not? - 18th Oct 2004 12:34am
most ax's look as though they are ready for the scrappy but credit were its due that looks sweet and looks v.quick at the wheel.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Sexy or not? - 18th Oct 2004 7:58am
The front looks really nice, hes done well to get it looking like that... but the back still looks absolutely disgusting, needs a light conversion!!!
Posted By: lazy_ben Re: Sexy or not? - 19th Oct 2004 12:48pm
Thats a little beast. Im liking that yes
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Sexy or not? - 23rd Oct 2004 6:14pm
Hiya hi

Nope sorry Rob, it looks like a little shoe box on a set of wheels. The front looks ok i spose. I aint really a fan of white cars though. The interior is a mess and needs sorting. I agree with Adam and Daz all the way happy
Posted By: tony_220 Re: Sexy or not? - 23rd Oct 2004 6:32pm
Quote
Originally posted by AX_125:
Weight saving, this is a 550kg car, probs less than half yours and mine.

I am sure if he wanted a nice inside he would of bought a Lexus.

and if he wanted a fast car he wouldnt have bought an ax! lol!
Posted By: dave the rave Re: Sexy or not? - 23rd Oct 2004 6:37pm
no sorry dont like ax y put all that money and time in to a shoe box
Posted By: mikebroomy Re: Sexy or not? - 23rd Oct 2004 9:17pm
not a bad lookin ax i think, side with sporty on this 1. hopefully sort inside out and the rear and it would be a stunner.

good point tony too!
Posted By: AX_125 Re: Sexy or not? - 24th Oct 2004 4:46pm
Sorry i disagree with Tony.

An AX GT is totally underated and is far better, faster, IMHO nicer looking than its rivals at the time (eg Nova)

An AX is a monsterously quick car for what it is, my 1.1 done 60 in less than 12 seconds and suprised alot of 1.4's etc, not alot of 1.1's can claim the same.

Personally i like this car because he has spent the money on a car he obviously is very happy with. I would rather have this than loose value on a brand new corsa sxi for example which everyone has. Put it this way, that "slow" AX will kill most cars on the 1/4 mile.
© Wirral-Wikiwirral