WikiWirral Share a Little Learn a Lot about your Wirral
Forum Stats
12193 Members
65 Forums
72622 Topics
978620 Posts
81 posts in the last 24hrs
Max Online: 7831 @ 8th Apr 2013 4:18pm
Who's Online - Click Me
98 registered (4436789, 17 invisible), 1626 Guests and 213 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Social Media : Follow Us


(Views 7days)This Weeks Most Read
Parking Charges 1114
Trump 1097
Question Time 483
Something to get a drone off a roof! 465
Paypal help 448
Paper Recycling. ? 381
Animal Cruelty in the Film Industry 377
Best Price for Scarpping my car 355
When we live to be a 100 yrs old 354
Problem With Wifi 327
New General Forums
Test on old english words
by derekdwc
20th Jan 2017 8:02pm
Jets
by cools
20th Jan 2017 12:14pm
The Scouse Accent
by palemoon
18th Jan 2017 7:49pm
birthday wishes
by sunnyside
18th Jan 2017 12:48pm
New Wirral History
753 Sea Horse, Unit 9, Wallasey Waterfront
by Norton
18th Jan 2017 9:07pm
What was County Hall, Abbey Street, Birkenhead?
by yoller
15th Jan 2017 1:28pm
752 The Old Manor Club, Withens Lane, Liscard
by Norton
13th Jan 2017 2:20pm
751 Plough Inn, Mount Pleasant Rd, New Brighton
by Norton
13th Jan 2017 1:38pm
351 Prince Alfred 30 Tunnel Road 30 30 to 32
by yoller
8th Jan 2017 7:18pm
Forum Tips
Photo Gallery Forums
fireworks on the Mersey last night
Hadlow train station
Topic Replies
Trimm Rock Quarry, Cilcain
by rocks
11:14 PM
Looking to swap an xbox one for a ps4
by Matt98
10:36 PM
Trump
by granny
09:01 PM
Animal Cruelty in the Film Industry
by svenlock68
08:43 PM
Canal Fishing
by Habdab
08:37 PM
Police Convoy
by svenlock68
08:13 PM
Problem With Wifi
by Uffda
07:32 PM
Question Time
by paxvobiscum
07:23 PM
What song are you listening to?
by diggingdeeper
06:41 PM
January
M Tu W Th F Sa Su
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31
Recent Posts : What's On ?
Indian/Jazz fusion music Liverpool
by buddy
17th Jan 2017 9:46am
Chinese New Year Liverpool
by paxvobiscum
15th Jan 2017 11:08am
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#850460 - 14th Jan 2014 10:15pm Should the accusers be named?
Elizabeth Offline
Veteran

Registered: 28th Jul 2011
Posts: 718
Loc: Prenton, Wirral
Just watching the News about Dave Lee Travis, Rolf Harris, William Roache et al. Is it just me who believes that if they are all found not guilty of their alleged charges, then the women who brought the charges against them should be named?
I think it's grossly unfair, thinking back to the case with Kevin LeVell, that he had to endure the whole saga which likely ruined his life for many months (and probably still is) and yet the girl who pressed charges gets away without any recourse.

Top
National News : Advertising
Click me for more Information......

* * * Rapid Hydraulics - Hydraulic Hose Repairs * * *
Now Advertise with WikiWirral.
WikiWirral stats 35,000 Page Views a Day +500 Search Engines.. Click Me
#850480 - 14th Jan 2014 11:05pm Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: Elizabeth]
Willo_ Offline
Forum Master

Registered: 5th Jul 2012
Posts: 2518
Loc: Merseyside
Just because a jury clears someone it does not mean they are totally 100% innocent, there a number of reasons why a jury finds someone not guilty, perhaps the alleged victim can not remember all details, maybe because there head is so screwed up after what happened to them, there mind blocks out certain parts.

And you say name them.

Here is a scenario for you:

Your walking down the street and you are dragged in the bushes and assaulted, but you go home and get showered washing vital evidence away, you go to the police and report it after, (it goes without saying the police will believe you) they go and arrest someone for it, (you do not want your name published) which is fair enough.
Now in court you can not remember much about the night as thinking about it makes you depressed and causes you emotional pain, and also you washed vital evidence away, the jury clear this person.

So you agree that your name should be published in the papers and the News branding you a lier.

I think not.

And am sorry but if there was a prize for the most stupid idea
then you have just won 1st prize.





Edited by Mark (15th Jan 2014 10:23am)
Edit Reason: Image Removed
_________________________
..

Top
#850482 - 14th Jan 2014 11:15pm Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: Elizabeth]
Salmon Online   content
Forum Addict

Registered: 8th Oct 2011
Posts: 1709
Loc: Wallasey
Taking the above into account why should the accused be named before the jury finds them guilty?
e.g.

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/l...t-29733885.html

Top
#850486 - 14th Jan 2014 11:33pm Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: Elizabeth]
RUDEBOX Offline
Wiki Master

Registered: 29th Aug 2008
Posts: 19050
Loc: Bob Land
Lets not forget that Legal Aid has now gone....
_________________________
Mia Mabel


Top
#850487 - 14th Jan 2014 11:35pm Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: Willo_]
RUDEBOX Offline
Wiki Master

Registered: 29th Aug 2008
Posts: 19050
Loc: Bob Land
Originally Posted By: Willo_
Just because a jury clears someone it does not mean they are totally 100% innocent, there a number of reasons why a jury finds someone not guilty, perhaps the alleged victim can not remember all details, maybe because there head is so screwed up after what happened to them, there mind blocks out certain parts.

And you say name them.

Here is a scenario for you:

Your walking down the street and you are dragged in the bushes and assaulted, but you go home and get showered washing vital evidence away, you go to the police and report it after, (it goes without saying the police will believe you) they go and arrest someone for it, (you do not want your name published) which is fair enough.
Now in court you can not remember much about the night as thinking about it makes you depressed and causes you emotional pain, and also you washed vital evidence away, the jury clear this person.

So you agree that your name should be published in the papers and the News branding you a lier.

I think not.

And am sorry but if there was a prize for the most stupid idea
then you have just won 1st prize.



withthat
_________________________
Mia Mabel


Top
#850492 - 14th Jan 2014 11:51pm Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: Salmon]
granny Offline

Wiki Master

Registered: 29th Jun 2011
Posts: 13691
Loc: Wirral
Originally Posted By: Salmon
Taking the above into account why should the accused be named before the jury finds them guilty?
e.g.

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/l...t-29733885.html


Agreed, and with regard to naming accusers, that is also a very sensitive issue. I don't think they should be named in these cases, but maybe the accuser should be liable to pay some compensation, if the accused is found innocent.
_________________________
...and those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music.FN

Top
#850495 - 15th Jan 2014 12:05am Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: Elizabeth]
RUDEBOX Offline
Wiki Master

Registered: 29th Aug 2008
Posts: 19050
Loc: Bob Land
What if the accused can afford to buy a top rate lawyer and the survivor/ victim cannot?
_________________________
Mia Mabel


Top
#850497 - 15th Jan 2014 12:10am Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: RUDEBOX]
granny Offline

Wiki Master

Registered: 29th Jun 2011
Posts: 13691
Loc: Wirral
Originally Posted By: RUDEBOX
What if the accused can afford to buy a top rate lawyer and the survivor/ victim cannot?


What if the accused can't and the accuser can ? That would be a more serious issue. smile
_________________________
...and those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music.FN

Top
#850499 - 15th Jan 2014 12:17am Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: granny]
RUDEBOX Offline
Wiki Master

Registered: 29th Aug 2008
Posts: 19050
Loc: Bob Land
Originally Posted By: granny
Originally Posted By: RUDEBOX
What if the accused can afford to buy a top rate lawyer and the survivor/ victim cannot?


What if the accused can't and the accuser can ? That would be a more serious issue. smile
Fair point. smile Well, not 'more serious' but equally unfair.


Edited by RUDEBOX (15th Jan 2014 12:21am)
_________________________
Mia Mabel


Top
#850501 - 15th Jan 2014 12:21am Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: RUDEBOX]
TheDr Offline
Forum Master

Registered: 23rd Feb 2010
Posts: 2631
Loc: Wirral
How about one of the foundation stones of the British legal system, Innocent Until PROVEN Guilty means that no one can report on a case (with names) until the case is over.

If they are found Guilty, they can be named.

If they are found Not Guilty, they can't.

Forget all this rubbish about how if the names are published other victims could come forward, if the case was strong enough to win (and if it isn't legally it shouldn't be proceeded with anyway) then let it stand on its own feet.

Lives can be ruined FOREVER with false accusations, and some lies never die.

I don't think that accusers should have to pay the accused money if they are found Not Guilty, but I do think that any record check for any future prosecutions should show the History of any previous allegations made by the accusers.

Top
#850503 - 15th Jan 2014 12:30am Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: Elizabeth]
RUDEBOX Offline
Wiki Master

Registered: 29th Aug 2008
Posts: 19050
Loc: Bob Land
Whatever happened to 'Innocent until proven guilty'?

The News is full of alleged offenders- was I asleep when the Law changed? Has it changed,even?
_________________________
Mia Mabel


Top
#850531 - 15th Jan 2014 10:12am Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: Elizabeth]
LiamW Offline
Newbeee

Registered: 14th Jan 2014
Posts: 37
Loc: Wallasey
They are named so others can come forward.

Without them being named, evidence might not be found.

Top
#850532 - 15th Jan 2014 10:21am Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: Elizabeth]
Mark Online   Reading


Wiki Master

Registered: 9th Nov 2003
Posts: 21002
Loc: Wirral
I don't think the law has changed, I think its the reporters using the words "Reportedly" and "allegedly" gets into the media and then it spreads.

But then thinking about it we always read Mr x has been remanded in custody until the court date charged with xxx. That gets into the News because you will have reporters in the courts posting such. I think there are even court listings in the buildings so you know who is in what court.

Innocent until proven guilty is all about the court room. IMO.

isn't that why it got to the point with the newspapers to sign up to a code of conduct to self police as it was all getting out of hand.

More should be done to protect the innocent, in certain cases, but with the names listed above, the media gave the victims the strength to come forward.

So i don't think there is one answer to fit all situations.

My thoughts.
_________________________
My Avatar images are all from the Wirral Gallery.Click Me
Wow Wirral History is coming along Great! Wirral History

we get +200 new members a month now smile

Top
#850540 - 15th Jan 2014 11:38am Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: Elizabeth]
Gibbo Offline
Forum Addict

Registered: 27th Dec 2010
Posts: 1722
Loc: Oxton
I was reading about this on another forum and someone brought up Peter Adamson - Len Fairclough from Corrie.

Everyone remembers the accusations, but what they don't remember is that he was cleared.

Even his obituary continued to tar and taint him:

Street's shamed Len Fairclough dies
Disgraced Coronation Street star Peter Adamson - who played womaniser Len Fairclough in the soap - has died a penniless recluse.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-95683/Streets-shamed-Len-Fairclough-dies.html

Top
#850541 - 15th Jan 2014 11:55am Re: Should the accusers be named? [Re: Elizabeth]
Mark Online   Reading


Wiki Master

Registered: 9th Nov 2003
Posts: 21002
Loc: Wirral
That is So Sad.
From a Screen Idol to Nobody.

I didn't even realise he had been cleared.
_________________________
My Avatar images are all from the Wirral Gallery.Click Me
Wow Wirral History is coming along Great! Wirral History

we get +200 new members a month now smile

Top
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >

Moderator:  Mod 
Random Wirral Images

Click to View Topic.
Newest Topics
Police Convoy
by diggingdeeper
06:51 PM
Problem With Wifi
by Uffda
22nd Jan 2017 4:06pm
Trimm Rock Quarry, Cilcain
by diggingdeeper
22nd Jan 2017 5:03am
Animal Cruelty in the Film Industry
by granny
20th Jan 2017 12:00pm
Question Time
by derekdwc
19th Jan 2017 11:27pm
For Sale & Free
Looking to swap an xbox one for a ps4
by Matt98
10:36 PM
Ariston hifi amplfier vgc 35
by montyz
12:39 PM
Technika 42" smart tv
by vw_kyle
09:38 AM
LCD/Plasma wall bracket - 10
by DavidB
22nd Jan 2017 2:16pm
Childs solid wood bed
by Mike_Hoylake
22nd Jan 2017 1:01pm
Featured Member
Registered: 7th Aug 2006
Posts: 831
Newest Members
Helena, ajsmith66, aw2010, Largeloaf32, techgran
12193 Registered Users
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
New Wirral Info
Paper Recycling. ?
by fish5133
19th Jan 2017 11:16am
Paypal help
by venice
17th Jan 2017 8:59pm
Brown Bin Collections Restarting Today 17th Jan
by fish5133
17th Jan 2017 9:04am
Indian/Jazz fusion music Liverpool
by paxvobiscum
15th Jan 2017 11:19am
Chinese New Year Liverpool
by paxvobiscum
15th Jan 2017 11:08am
News : New Topics
Police Convoy
by diggingdeeper
06:51 PM
Repose en Paix Gordon Kaye
by diggingdeeper
06:08 PM
Brides Flown In
by granny
21st Jan 2017 11:16pm
Tasering Again
by diggingdeeper
20th Jan 2017 6:14pm
Trump
by cools
20th Jan 2017 4:16pm
New Enthusiast Forums
Problem With Wifi
by Uffda
22nd Jan 2017 4:06pm
Trimm Rock Quarry, Cilcain
by diggingdeeper
22nd Jan 2017 5:03am
Animal Cruelty in the Film Industry
by granny
20th Jan 2017 12:00pm
Question Time
by derekdwc
19th Jan 2017 11:27pm
Sanctuary awaits 5 bears
by venice
19th Jan 2017 6:25pm
(Views 24hrs)Trending Newest Topics
Police Convoy 108
Repose en Paix Gordon Kaye 38
Looking to swap an xbox one for a ps4 24
Wirral Sunrise Sunset
Sunrise Tue 8:08am
Sunset Tue 4:40pm
Local Time Tue 5:14am
WikiWirral Can . . . .