WikiWirral Wirral's Biggest Online Forum
Forum Stats
12193 Members
65 Forums
72624 Topics
978634 Posts
84 posts in the last 24hrs
Max Online: 7831 @ 8th Apr 2013 4:18pm
Who's Online - Click Me
100 registered (3richard, 15 invisible), 1700 Guests and 200 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Social Media : Follow Us


(Views 7days)This Weeks Most Read
Trump 1226
Parking Charges 1134
Question Time 501
Something to get a drone off a roof! 472
Paypal help 450
Animal Cruelty in the Film Industry 392
Paper Recycling. ? 386
When we live to be a 100 yrs old 358
Problem With Wifi 348
Tasering Again 305
New General Forums
Personalized fines for speeding .
by venice
Today at 12:00 PM
Test on old english words
by derekdwc
20th Jan 2017 8:02pm
Jets
by cools
20th Jan 2017 12:14pm
The Scouse Accent
by palemoon
18th Jan 2017 7:49pm
New Wirral History
753 Sea Horse, Unit 9, Wallasey Waterfront
by Norton
18th Jan 2017 9:07pm
What was County Hall, Abbey Street, Birkenhead?
by yoller
15th Jan 2017 1:28pm
752 The Old Manor Club, Withens Lane, Liscard
by Norton
13th Jan 2017 2:20pm
751 Plough Inn, Mount Pleasant Rd, New Brighton
by Norton
13th Jan 2017 1:38pm
351 Prince Alfred 30 Tunnel Road 30 30 to 32
by yoller
8th Jan 2017 7:18pm
Forum Tips
Photo Gallery Forums
fireworks on the Mersey last night
Hadlow train station
Topic Replies
Problem With Wifi
by daveybm
42 minutes 43 seconds ago
Police Convoy
by Beethoven
58 minutes 30 seconds ago
Trimm Rock Quarry, Cilcain
by fish5133
Today at 12:20 PM
Repose en Paix Gordon Kaye
by fish5133
Today at 12:17 PM
New icon for sky?
by Excoriator
Today at 12:08 PM
Trump
by fish5133
Today at 12:08 PM
Looking to swap an xbox one for a ps4
by Matt98
Yesterday at 10:36 PM
Animal Cruelty in the Film Industry
by svenlock68
Yesterday at 08:43 PM
Canal Fishing
by Habdab
Yesterday at 08:37 PM
January
M Tu W Th F Sa Su
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31
Recent Posts : What's On ?
Indian/Jazz fusion music Liverpool
by buddy
17th Jan 2017 9:46am
Chinese New Year Liverpool
by paxvobiscum
15th Jan 2017 11:08am
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#719452 - 25th Aug 2012 12:11am Jury Returns Apple v Samsung Verdict
TheDr Offline
Forum Master

Registered: 23rd Feb 2010
Posts: 2631
Loc: Wirral
The Jury have come back in on the copyright infringement case brought by Apple claiming that Samsung had infringed on its patents.

They have found that "several" Samsung devices have breached those copyrights / patents.

This could lead to Samsung Tablets being pulled from the shelves, as has already happened in several countries.

Top
National News : Advertising
Click me for more Information......


Looking for a Service / Tradesman? Look in our Local Business Directory. Click Me
#719456 - 25th Aug 2012 12:15am Re: Jury Returns Apple v Samsung Verdict [Re: TheDr]
SammyJones Offline
Member

Registered: 26th Jul 2012
Posts: 90
Loc: Irby
Great News!

Top
#719469 - 25th Aug 2012 12:56am Re: Jury Returns Apple v Samsung Verdict [Re: TheDr]
_Ste_ Offline


Wiki Master

Registered: 7th Aug 2005
Posts: 15985
Loc: New Brighton
Lol raftl
Last I heard of this was Atari suing Sidam in the 1980's

_________________________


http://www.youtube.com/user/stetopop

Top
#719535 - 25th Aug 2012 10:06am Re: Jury Returns Apple v Samsung Verdict [Re: TheDr]
saltytom Online   content
Old Hand

Registered: 23rd May 2011
Posts: 348
Loc: WALLASEY
Why is it "Great News", slap on the wrist and a fine probably.

Top
#719578 - 25th Aug 2012 1:05pm Re: Jury Returns Apple v Samsung Verdict [Re: SammyJones]
chriskay Offline
Forum Veteran

Registered: 25th Oct 2007
Posts: 4868
Loc: shropshire
Originally Posted By: SammyJones
Great news!


Why?
_________________________
Carpe diem.

Top
#719584 - 25th Aug 2012 1:31pm Re: Jury Returns Apple v Samsung Verdict [Re: TheDr]
Moonstar Offline

Forum Addict

Registered: 2nd Jul 2011
Posts: 1240
Loc: Wirral
Samsung ordered to pay Apple $1billion.

Samsung has a much bigger market worldwide than Apple.

Top
#719611 - 25th Aug 2012 3:11pm Re: Jury Returns Apple v Samsung Verdict [Re: Moonstar]
mrhanky Offline
Forum Addict

Registered: 1st Dec 2010
Posts: 1236
Loc: my house
Wonder if they will stop supplying apple?

Top
#719618 - 25th Aug 2012 3:33pm Re: Jury Returns Apple v Samsung Verdict [Re: Moonstar]
_Ste_ Offline


Wiki Master

Registered: 7th Aug 2005
Posts: 15985
Loc: New Brighton
Originally Posted By: Moonstar


Samsung has a much bigger market worldwide than Apple.


That is not correct, Apple are a much bigger outfit and always will be.

Only problem with Apple is they don't cater for the low end of the market for the people with no money.

You need money to buy Apple products, Apple rule the roost,always have and always will!
All their products are quality.

Shame on Samsung and all the other companys for ripping them off!

Sue em all i say and get all the copy shite off the market, crappy samsung,windows phones, ban them from the country, damn riff raff phones thumbsdown
_________________________


http://www.youtube.com/user/stetopop

Top
#719704 - 25th Aug 2012 7:31pm Re: Jury Returns Apple v Samsung Verdict [Re: _Ste_]
TheDr Offline
Forum Master

Registered: 23rd Feb 2010
Posts: 2631
Loc: Wirral

Apple's decisive victory in a landmark US patent case against Samsung could reshape the hot sector for mobile devices and slow the momentum of Google and its Android system, analysts say.

Apple won more than $1 billion in the case Friday, after a California jury found the South Korean electronics giant infringed on dozens of patents held by the iPhone and iPad maker.

Although Google was not a party in the case, it makes the Android operating system which was central to the case -- a system which Apple's late co-founder Steve Jobs called a "stolen" product.

Apple has been battling as Samsung and other manufacturers of the free Android system eat away at its market share in the sizzling market for smartphones and tablet computers.

"I think this will force a reset on Android products as they are reengineered to get around Apple's patents," said Rob Enderle, a technology analyst and consultant with the Enderle Group.

But Enderle said other companies may benefit from the decision, including Microsoft, which has been lagging in the mobile sector, and Blackberry maker Research in Motion, which has been hit hardest by the rise of Android devices.

The court ruling, said Enderle, "should provide a stronger opportunity for both of Microsoft's new platforms -- Windows 8 and Windows Phone 8 -- because they come with indemnification against Apple, suddenly making them far safer and possibly a faster way to get product to market."

The decision also "will make RIM far more attractive as an acquisition because RIM's patents are thought to be strong enough to hold off Apple," Enderle said.

"Both Samsung and Google may make a play for the company, and both Microsoft and Apple may move to block them."

In recent months, Android devices have grabbed more than 50 percent of the US smartphone market to around 30 percent for Apple, while RIM's shares have slid to around 12 percent.

The patents at play include software such as the "bounceback" feature for smartphone users when scrolling and pinch-zooming, which are featured on Android devices.

Florian Mueller, a consultant who follows patent and copyright issues, said Friday's court ruling was "a huge breakthrough."

"The jury essentially concluded that Samsung is a reckless copycat and, since some of the infringement is Google's responsibility, basically agreed with Steve Jobs's claim that Android is a stolen product," he wrote on his blog.

Still, a lot hinges on what happens next in court, with the case likely to be tied up in appeal for some time.

Judge Lucy Koh set a September 20 hearing where she will consider whether to overturn or modify the jury verdict, whether to impose "punitive" damages which would triple the award and whether to issue injunctions against Samsung.

A critical factor will be whether Apple will be able to obtain a permanent injunction, or halt in sales on infringing Samsung devices, and whether this would be enforced during the appeal.

Dennis Crouch, a University of Missouri patent law specialist, said the judge will have broad discretion.

"Some courts have issued broad injunctions that essentially say 'stop infringing the patent,' others issue much more narrow orders directed only toward the particular products that are adjudged to infringe," Crouch said on his blog.

"The reality is that Samsung has been planning for the likelihood of injunctive relief and is surely ready to stop selling any of the infringing products and replace those products with ones that at least have not yet been adjudged as infringing."

This could lead to more legal battles, since Apple has another lawsuit pending on Samsung's newer handheld devices.

Samsung has pledged to keep fighting the case, and said that if it stands "it will lead to fewer choices, less innovation, and potentially higher prices."

Samsung called it "unfortunate that patent law can be manipulated to give one company a monopoly over rectangles with rounded corners, or technology that is being improved every day by Samsung and other companies."

Analysts say that aside from Samsung, Google could be the big loser, especially if Apple pursues its litigation against other manufacturers.

"Google cannot stop Apple. It is now on the run and will have to scramble to make software changes to Android," Mueller said.

"In a few years, the San Jose jury verdict may -- I repeat, MAY -- be remembered as the tipping point that sent Android on a downward spiral."


Appy-Geek

Top
#719783 - 26th Aug 2012 9:23am Re: Jury Returns Apple v Samsung Verdict [Re: _Ste_]
Moonstar Offline

Forum Addict

Registered: 2nd Jul 2011
Posts: 1240
Loc: Wirral
Ste - just repeating the BBC News re market share. Cannot prove.

Top

Moderator:  Mod 
Random Wirral Images

Click to View Topic.
Newest Topics
New icon for sky?
by venice
Today at 11:21 AM
Police Convoy
by diggingdeeper
Yesterday at 06:51 PM
Problem With Wifi
by Uffda
22nd Jan 2017 4:06pm
Trimm Rock Quarry, Cilcain
by diggingdeeper
22nd Jan 2017 5:03am
Animal Cruelty in the Film Industry
by granny
20th Jan 2017 12:00pm
For Sale & Free
Looking to swap an xbox one for a ps4
by Matt98
Yesterday at 10:36 PM
Ariston hifi amplfier vgc 35
by montyz
Yesterday at 12:39 PM
Technika 42" smart tv
by vw_kyle
Yesterday at 09:38 AM
LCD/Plasma wall bracket - 10
by DavidB
22nd Jan 2017 2:16pm
Childs solid wood bed
by Mike_Hoylake
22nd Jan 2017 1:01pm
Featured Member
Registered: 31st May 2011
Posts: 1093
Newest Members
Helena, ajsmith66, aw2010, Largeloaf32, techgran
12193 Registered Users
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
New Wirral Info
Paper Recycling. ?
by fish5133
19th Jan 2017 11:16am
Paypal help
by venice
17th Jan 2017 8:59pm
Brown Bin Collections Restarting Today 17th Jan
by fish5133
17th Jan 2017 9:04am
Indian/Jazz fusion music Liverpool
by paxvobiscum
15th Jan 2017 11:19am
Chinese New Year Liverpool
by paxvobiscum
15th Jan 2017 11:08am
News : New Topics
Police Convoy
by diggingdeeper
Yesterday at 06:51 PM
Repose en Paix Gordon Kaye
by diggingdeeper
Yesterday at 06:08 PM
Brides Flown In
by granny
21st Jan 2017 11:16pm
Tasering Again
by diggingdeeper
20th Jan 2017 6:14pm
Trump
by cools
20th Jan 2017 4:16pm
New Enthusiast Forums
New icon for sky?
by venice
11:21 AM
Problem With Wifi
by Uffda
22nd Jan 2017 4:06pm
Trimm Rock Quarry, Cilcain
by diggingdeeper
22nd Jan 2017 5:03am
Animal Cruelty in the Film Industry
by granny
20th Jan 2017 12:00pm
Question Time
by derekdwc
19th Jan 2017 11:27pm
(Views 24hrs)Trending Newest Topics
Police Convoy 185
Repose en Paix Gordon Kaye 54
New icon for sky? 39
Looking to swap an xbox one for a ps4 29
Personalized fines for speeding . 2
Wirral Sunrise Sunset
Sunrise Tue 8:08am
Sunset Tue 4:40pm
Local Time Tue 1:27pm
WikiWirral Can . . . .