|
Forums65
Topics76,361
Posts1,033,315
Members14,578
| |
Most Online16,551
Feb 2nd, 2024
|
|
|
5 members (2 invisible),
10,124
guests, and
405
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
S |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,195
Forum Addict
|
Forum Addict
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,195 |
Although Telford may have destroyed his own plans and documentation I would have thought his financial backers (i.e - Tobin & Laird) would have received copies of these plans and costings, and that perhaps (somewhere in the Tobin or Laird family archives) some of these records might still exist. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,632 Likes: 14
Wiki Veteran
|
|
Wiki Veteran
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,632 Likes: 14 |
I doubt Tobin and Laird had that kind of money, guessing about 90-100 million in today's terms, i wonder if they were knocking on Parliaments door.
God help us,
Come yourself,
Don't send Jesus,
This is no place for children.
Bertieone.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,195
Forum Addict
|
|
Forum Addict
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,195 |
I suppose that, regardless of the precise source of financial backing, it would have almost certainly required an Act of Parliament to permit such a scheme to progress. If the likes of Laird or Tobin did not have copies of the documentation then it could well be that details were submitted in proposals put before Parliament.
|
|
|
Click to View Topic.
|
|
|
Posts: 2,354
Joined: April 2009
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
